[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu...
]
Vitali Yemialyanchyk commented on JBIDE-3033:
---------------------------------------------
OneToOne should be tested more attentively...
http://java.sun.com/javaee/5/docs/api/javax/persistence/OneToOne.html
it preference is example 1 from reference above
is JoinColumn obligatory annotation here?
for simplest case i expected it is not.
Generate Hibernate/JPA - ManyToOne is more preferable choice than
OneToOne
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBIDE-3033
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3033
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Hibernate
Affects Versions: 3.0.0.beta1
Reporter: Vitali Yemialyanchyk
Assignee: Anton Klimkovich
Fix For: 3.0.0.cr1
OneToOne relation is much more constrained than ManyToOne.
So if there is no back reference - it is more likely this is ManyToOne relation.
In the case of back reference existence - ManyToOne will always be a safe bet,
so in this ambiguous case ManyToOne seems is a better choice -
but this is thing for discussion - there are some questions here.
+ may be we should add some comments into sources.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira