[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBIDE-9726) inconsistent licensing terms across JBoss Tools - SOA Tooling site
by Nick Boldt (JIRA)
inconsistent licensing terms across JBoss Tools - SOA Tooling site
------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBIDE-9726
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9726
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: drools, pi4soa, Savara, teiid, updatesite
Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M3
Reporter: Nick Boldt
Assignee: Kris Verlaenen
Fix For: 3.3.0.M4
Attachments: inconsistent-license-details.png
Most features in JBoss Tools have a license from Red Hat which mentions EPL, GPL, and other licenses. It's a catch-all which allows a cleaner view of what's being installed.
!inconsistent-license-details.png!
The following features should adopt this statement in their features so that we're consistent across the board:
Savara (GPL)
Drools (ASL)
pi4soa (ASL)
Teiid (EPL)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-11969) configure maven repo adds jbosstools-maven-repository profile
by Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)
Max Rydahl Andersen created JBIDE-11969:
-------------------------------------------
Summary: configure maven repo adds jbosstools-maven-repository profile
Key: JBIDE-11969
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11969
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: maven
Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen
Assignee: Fred Bricon
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 3.3.0.CR1
trying out changes after JBIDE-11818
now without changing anything configure maven repositories is trying to add:
<profile>
<id>jbosstools-maven-profile</id>
<activation>
<activeByDefault>true</activeByDefault>
</activation>
<repositories/>
<pluginRepositories/>
</profile>
1) we shouldn't have a "jbosstools" profile - this is for use both in and outside of eclipse.
2) why aren't we just adding the profile(s) under activeProfile instead of using activebydefault ?
and use the name (without spaces) of the repo as the profile id ? i.e. jboss-eap-repository, jboss-wfk-repository etc. ?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-11953) UI challenges with "Configure maven repositories"
by Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)
Max Rydahl Andersen created JBIDE-11953:
-------------------------------------------
Summary: UI challenges with "Configure maven repositories"
Key: JBIDE-11953
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11953
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: maven
Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen
Assignee: Fred Bricon
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 3.3.0.CR1
Finally got to try out the "configure maven repositories" quickfixing for missing -redhat and .org dependencies.
Some of this feels and works very "backwards" to me and not sure how to fix it yet so im going to list out the issues I found and we can split it up/add as subtasks afterwards.
A) Both the "Configure Maven repositories" AND the "See how to setup XYZ repositories in your settings.xml".
I think Very few would select the "Configure maven repositories" option over the more explanatory "See how to setup.." quickfix.
Why do we need both ? Why move the link to the "configure maven repositories" and just let ocnfigure maven repositories know what kind of dependency we are looking for and adjust its UI based on it ?
B) When using Configure Maven Repositiories not a single message or confirmation dialog is telling or asking that this is going to change settings.xml - that *must* be fixed.
C) When doing the quickfix on a -redhat missing repository why do I as a user have to know I should ignore the long list of public repositories in here, incl. jboss.org which in case of -redhat we do not want to encourage users to use unless they really know what they are doing ?
D) Recognize JBoss Maven Enterprise Repositories... (RJBMER) - If I point it to something that is not a repository it just ignores it and says nothing. Not even info on what it is actually looking for - I would expect it to say "Could not recognize this repository on disk since I could not find <xyz>. Do you still want to add this as Maven repository ?"
E) RJBMER - if I add multiple EAP repositories they get added with the same name and thus you don't know which is which.
F) when pressing finish no confirmation/no delta/no warning given when actually overwriting one of the possibly most important setting files on a developers machine.
G) in the generated settings.xml existing <id>'s seem to be put at the end instaed of at the beginning - aren't ordering hornored in the serialization ?
H) all comments are gone.
I) it does not seem to activate/deactive the profiles - at least not listed in <activeProfiles>; so how are these fixes actually going to help ?
J) naming seem to be based on some hardcoded constants with no option for users to influence them instead of just getting "jboss-eap-maven-repository.0"
K) and couldn't the dialog actually tell me the repository i'm adding actually have the artifact I'm quickfixing for ?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-11606) Mavenize JBoss Tools releases
by Tomas Vala (JIRA)
Tomas Vala created JBIDE-11606:
----------------------------------
Summary: Mavenize JBoss Tools releases
Key: JBIDE-11606
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11606
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Feature Request
Reporter: Tomas Vala
Priority: Minor
Hello,
please consider making JBoss Tools releases available through maven repository.
For reference: Eclipse is aiming to officialy provide maven feed for BIRT Runtime (Business Intelligence and Reporting Tools) from Juno release on (2012/6). It would be nice and practical if at least portion of JBoss Tools, JBoss BIRT Integration ODA plugin would follow this trend.
{noformat}
Personal opinion based on recent experience:
I consider current distribution channels and methods to be somewhat lacking compared to nowadays possibilities. Weird artificial dependencies of JBoss BIRT Integration Eclipse feature, direct download links for individual jars are rather difficult to find on the web site.
{noformat}
Tomas
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 10 months