[JBoss JIRA] (TOOLSDOC-492) Create new docs landing page on new tools.jboss.org site (moving to asciidoc for docs in process)
by Vlastimil Eliáš (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Vlastimil Eliáš updated TOOLSDOC-492:
-------------------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: Tod Online http://artistrylimited.com/catalogimages/Catalog%202005%20Update/New%20St... Tods Outlet
Chanel http://www.terje-iren.no/style.asp)
> Create new docs landing page on new tools.jboss.org site (moving to asciidoc for docs in process)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TOOLSDOC-492
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-492
> Project: Documentation for JBoss Tools and Developer Studio
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: User Guide
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Nick Boldt
> Assignee: Michelle Murray
> Fix For: 4.2.0.Beta2
>
> Attachments: asciidoc-to-html5-with-sidebar-toc.png, converted-adoc-asciidoc-css-not-github-css.png, converted-adoc-github-css-actual.png, converted-adoc-github-css.png, openshift-chapter-generated-epub.png, openshift-chapter-generated-pdf.png, xref-do-not-render.png
>
>
> With the release of the new tools.jboss.org site, it's time to migrate the docs to the same skin / format / markup. Docbook is dead, long live Asciidoc!
> What [~mmurray] and I are thinking is that we would have a new landing page similar to one of these:
> http://tools.jboss.org/features/ (with icons that link to projects' latest doc)
> or
> http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/ (with the latest doc linked)
> And then under that landing page we'd have doc for each of projects' contributions to the User Guide, by milestone or Final release.
> Questions:
> a. [~maxandersen] [~burrsutter] [~mmusaji] Do we still need to provide 3 formats of doc - HTML, HTML-single, and PDF? Or can we replace that with this new content, PLUS include inline help doc within Eclipse? (That's another issue - see [~dgolovin] 's https://github.com/dgolovin/jbosstools-eclipse-docs/blob/master/docs/scen... for prototype)
> b. [~maxandersen] Should we include docs for "dead" projects like Freemarker, Portal, etc.? I'm guessing YES, even if the doc becomes out of date (ie., the doc for JBT 4.2 for Freemarker won't have changed much (or at all) since JBT 4.0/4.1).
> c. [~maxandersen] Should we convert old JBT 4.1.x (and/or 4.0.x, 3.3.x) doc to the new adoc format, or just start w/ the JBT 4.2.0.Beta1/2 doc? I'd be OK with 4.1 and maybe 4.0, but can we skip 3.3 since JBDS 5 is no longer fully supported?
> d. Will docbook2asciidoc [0] work for batch-converting docbook docs to adoc? @nick will try. If conversion works easily, then converting older User Guides is definitely more doable / less time consuming.
> [0] https://github.com/oreillymedia/docbook2asciidoc
> e. [~xcoulon] Is :page-component_version: still used, eg., in [1], or is the filename version itself used to categorize the content by milestone?
> [1] https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/blob/master/documentatio...
> f. If we decide to continue to include other formats (eg., html-single, pdf) should we link to those from these places [2], [3]?
> [2] http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/overview.html
> [3] http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/luna/4.2.0.Beta1.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.8#6338)
11 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TOOLSDOC-492) Create new docs landing page on new tools.jboss.org site (moving to asciidoc for docs in process)
by Anonymous (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Anonymous commented on TOOLSDOC-492:
------------------------------------
Tod Online http://artistrylimited.com/catalogimages/Catalog%202005%20Update/New%20St... Tods Outlet
Chanel http://www.terje-iren.no/style.asp
> Create new docs landing page on new tools.jboss.org site (moving to asciidoc for docs in process)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TOOLSDOC-492
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-492
> Project: Documentation for JBoss Tools and Developer Studio
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: User Guide
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Nick Boldt
> Assignee: Michelle Murray
> Fix For: 4.2.0.Beta2
>
> Attachments: asciidoc-to-html5-with-sidebar-toc.png, converted-adoc-asciidoc-css-not-github-css.png, converted-adoc-github-css-actual.png, converted-adoc-github-css.png, openshift-chapter-generated-epub.png, openshift-chapter-generated-pdf.png, xref-do-not-render.png
>
>
> With the release of the new tools.jboss.org site, it's time to migrate the docs to the same skin / format / markup. Docbook is dead, long live Asciidoc!
> What [~mmurray] and I are thinking is that we would have a new landing page similar to one of these:
> http://tools.jboss.org/features/ (with icons that link to projects' latest doc)
> or
> http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/ (with the latest doc linked)
> And then under that landing page we'd have doc for each of projects' contributions to the User Guide, by milestone or Final release.
> Questions:
> a. [~maxandersen] [~burrsutter] [~mmusaji] Do we still need to provide 3 formats of doc - HTML, HTML-single, and PDF? Or can we replace that with this new content, PLUS include inline help doc within Eclipse? (That's another issue - see [~dgolovin] 's https://github.com/dgolovin/jbosstools-eclipse-docs/blob/master/docs/scen... for prototype)
> b. [~maxandersen] Should we include docs for "dead" projects like Freemarker, Portal, etc.? I'm guessing YES, even if the doc becomes out of date (ie., the doc for JBT 4.2 for Freemarker won't have changed much (or at all) since JBT 4.0/4.1).
> c. [~maxandersen] Should we convert old JBT 4.1.x (and/or 4.0.x, 3.3.x) doc to the new adoc format, or just start w/ the JBT 4.2.0.Beta1/2 doc? I'd be OK with 4.1 and maybe 4.0, but can we skip 3.3 since JBDS 5 is no longer fully supported?
> d. Will docbook2asciidoc [0] work for batch-converting docbook docs to adoc? @nick will try. If conversion works easily, then converting older User Guides is definitely more doable / less time consuming.
> [0] https://github.com/oreillymedia/docbook2asciidoc
> e. [~xcoulon] Is :page-component_version: still used, eg., in [1], or is the filename version itself used to categorize the content by milestone?
> [1] https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/blob/master/documentatio...
> f. If we decide to continue to include other formats (eg., html-single, pdf) should we link to those from these places [2], [3]?
> [2] http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/overview.html
> [3] http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/luna/4.2.0.Beta1.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.8#6338)
11 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TOOLSDOC-492) Create new docs landing page on new tools.jboss.org site (moving to asciidoc for docs in process)
by Anonymous (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Anonymous commented on TOOLSDOC-492:
------------------------------------
Canada Goose Jackets http://horseshaven.org/storeimages/tote%20pinka.asp Canada Goose Toronto
Giuseppe Zanotti Sneakers Women http://pkingconsulting.com//includes/data.asp
> Create new docs landing page on new tools.jboss.org site (moving to asciidoc for docs in process)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TOOLSDOC-492
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-492
> Project: Documentation for JBoss Tools and Developer Studio
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: User Guide
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Nick Boldt
> Assignee: Michelle Murray
> Fix For: 4.2.0.Beta2
>
> Attachments: asciidoc-to-html5-with-sidebar-toc.png, converted-adoc-asciidoc-css-not-github-css.png, converted-adoc-github-css-actual.png, converted-adoc-github-css.png, openshift-chapter-generated-epub.png, openshift-chapter-generated-pdf.png, xref-do-not-render.png
>
>
> With the release of the new tools.jboss.org site, it's time to migrate the docs to the same skin / format / markup. Docbook is dead, long live Asciidoc!
> What [~mmurray] and I are thinking is that we would have a new landing page similar to one of these:
> http://tools.jboss.org/features/ (with icons that link to projects' latest doc)
> or
> http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/ (with the latest doc linked)
> And then under that landing page we'd have doc for each of projects' contributions to the User Guide, by milestone or Final release.
> Questions:
> a. [~maxandersen] [~burrsutter] [~mmusaji] Do we still need to provide 3 formats of doc - HTML, HTML-single, and PDF? Or can we replace that with this new content, PLUS include inline help doc within Eclipse? (That's another issue - see [~dgolovin] 's https://github.com/dgolovin/jbosstools-eclipse-docs/blob/master/docs/scen... for prototype)
> b. [~maxandersen] Should we include docs for "dead" projects like Freemarker, Portal, etc.? I'm guessing YES, even if the doc becomes out of date (ie., the doc for JBT 4.2 for Freemarker won't have changed much (or at all) since JBT 4.0/4.1).
> c. [~maxandersen] Should we convert old JBT 4.1.x (and/or 4.0.x, 3.3.x) doc to the new adoc format, or just start w/ the JBT 4.2.0.Beta1/2 doc? I'd be OK with 4.1 and maybe 4.0, but can we skip 3.3 since JBDS 5 is no longer fully supported?
> d. Will docbook2asciidoc [0] work for batch-converting docbook docs to adoc? @nick will try. If conversion works easily, then converting older User Guides is definitely more doable / less time consuming.
> [0] https://github.com/oreillymedia/docbook2asciidoc
> e. [~xcoulon] Is :page-component_version: still used, eg., in [1], or is the filename version itself used to categorize the content by milestone?
> [1] https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/blob/master/documentatio...
> f. If we decide to continue to include other formats (eg., html-single, pdf) should we link to those from these places [2], [3]?
> [2] http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/overview.html
> [3] http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/luna/4.2.0.Beta1.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.8#6338)
11 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-6953) Disable Usage Reporting in Tests
by Andre Dietisheim (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-6953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Andre Dietisheim closed JBIDE-6953.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Done
> Disable Usage Reporting in Tests
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-6953
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-6953
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Release
> Components: build, usage
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0.M2
> Environment: CI, Tests
> Reporter: Andre Dietisheim
> Assignee: Denis Golovin
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: analytics, google, report, usage
>
> the UI tests we run should not trigger hits in our usage tracking. The plugin has a preferences setting that disables reporting.
> It looks like we disable reporting for our UI test by having a custom config.ini for our UI tests.
> The "org.jboss.tools.usage" bundle has 2 preferences settings:
> "allowUsageReportPreference"
> Furthermore the usage plugin shall not pop up a dialog that asks the user if he allows us to report hits. This can be done with
> "askUserForUsageReportPreference"
> Both are in the Configuration Scope (common to all workbenches of a particular eclipse instance).
> For further lookup @see IUsageReportPreferenceConstants#USAGEREPORT_ENABLED_ID and IUsageReportPreferenceConstants#ASK_USER_USAGEREPORT_ID
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.8#6338)
11 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TOOLSDOC-492) Create new docs landing page on new tools.jboss.org site (moving to asciidoc for docs in process)
by Anonymous (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Anonymous commented on TOOLSDOC-492:
------------------------------------
http://dboogie.brinkster.net/images/gucci/gucci-backpack-cheap-p-66.html
envy by gucci http://gmsalesinc.brinkster.net/images/gucci/envy-by-gucci-p-11.html
> Create new docs landing page on new tools.jboss.org site (moving to asciidoc for docs in process)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TOOLSDOC-492
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-492
> Project: Documentation for JBoss Tools and Developer Studio
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: User Guide
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Nick Boldt
> Assignee: Michelle Murray
> Fix For: 4.2.0.Beta2
>
> Attachments: asciidoc-to-html5-with-sidebar-toc.png, converted-adoc-asciidoc-css-not-github-css.png, converted-adoc-github-css-actual.png, converted-adoc-github-css.png, openshift-chapter-generated-epub.png, openshift-chapter-generated-pdf.png, xref-do-not-render.png
>
>
> With the release of the new tools.jboss.org site, it's time to migrate the docs to the same skin / format / markup. Docbook is dead, long live Asciidoc!
> What [~mmurray] and I are thinking is that we would have a new landing page similar to one of these:
> http://tools.jboss.org/features/ (with icons that link to projects' latest doc)
> or
> http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/ (with the latest doc linked)
> And then under that landing page we'd have doc for each of projects' contributions to the User Guide, by milestone or Final release.
> Questions:
> a. [~maxandersen] [~burrsutter] [~mmusaji] Do we still need to provide 3 formats of doc - HTML, HTML-single, and PDF? Or can we replace that with this new content, PLUS include inline help doc within Eclipse? (That's another issue - see [~dgolovin] 's https://github.com/dgolovin/jbosstools-eclipse-docs/blob/master/docs/scen... for prototype)
> b. [~maxandersen] Should we include docs for "dead" projects like Freemarker, Portal, etc.? I'm guessing YES, even if the doc becomes out of date (ie., the doc for JBT 4.2 for Freemarker won't have changed much (or at all) since JBT 4.0/4.1).
> c. [~maxandersen] Should we convert old JBT 4.1.x (and/or 4.0.x, 3.3.x) doc to the new adoc format, or just start w/ the JBT 4.2.0.Beta1/2 doc? I'd be OK with 4.1 and maybe 4.0, but can we skip 3.3 since JBDS 5 is no longer fully supported?
> d. Will docbook2asciidoc [0] work for batch-converting docbook docs to adoc? @nick will try. If conversion works easily, then converting older User Guides is definitely more doable / less time consuming.
> [0] https://github.com/oreillymedia/docbook2asciidoc
> e. [~xcoulon] Is :page-component_version: still used, eg., in [1], or is the filename version itself used to categorize the content by milestone?
> [1] https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/blob/master/documentatio...
> f. If we decide to continue to include other formats (eg., html-single, pdf) should we link to those from these places [2], [3]?
> [2] http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/overview.html
> [3] http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/luna/4.2.0.Beta1.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.8#6338)
11 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TOOLSDOC-492) Create new docs landing page on new tools.jboss.org site (moving to asciidoc for docs in process)
by Anonymous (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Anonymous commented on TOOLSDOC-492:
------------------------------------
http://emconit.com/images/gucci/gucci-hobo-bags-p-37.html
black gucci watch http://digitalsigngraphics.com/images/gucci/black-gucci-watch-p-93.html
> Create new docs landing page on new tools.jboss.org site (moving to asciidoc for docs in process)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TOOLSDOC-492
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-492
> Project: Documentation for JBoss Tools and Developer Studio
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: User Guide
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Nick Boldt
> Assignee: Michelle Murray
> Fix For: 4.2.0.Beta2
>
> Attachments: asciidoc-to-html5-with-sidebar-toc.png, converted-adoc-asciidoc-css-not-github-css.png, converted-adoc-github-css-actual.png, converted-adoc-github-css.png, openshift-chapter-generated-epub.png, openshift-chapter-generated-pdf.png, xref-do-not-render.png
>
>
> With the release of the new tools.jboss.org site, it's time to migrate the docs to the same skin / format / markup. Docbook is dead, long live Asciidoc!
> What [~mmurray] and I are thinking is that we would have a new landing page similar to one of these:
> http://tools.jboss.org/features/ (with icons that link to projects' latest doc)
> or
> http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/ (with the latest doc linked)
> And then under that landing page we'd have doc for each of projects' contributions to the User Guide, by milestone or Final release.
> Questions:
> a. [~maxandersen] [~burrsutter] [~mmusaji] Do we still need to provide 3 formats of doc - HTML, HTML-single, and PDF? Or can we replace that with this new content, PLUS include inline help doc within Eclipse? (That's another issue - see [~dgolovin] 's https://github.com/dgolovin/jbosstools-eclipse-docs/blob/master/docs/scen... for prototype)
> b. [~maxandersen] Should we include docs for "dead" projects like Freemarker, Portal, etc.? I'm guessing YES, even if the doc becomes out of date (ie., the doc for JBT 4.2 for Freemarker won't have changed much (or at all) since JBT 4.0/4.1).
> c. [~maxandersen] Should we convert old JBT 4.1.x (and/or 4.0.x, 3.3.x) doc to the new adoc format, or just start w/ the JBT 4.2.0.Beta1/2 doc? I'd be OK with 4.1 and maybe 4.0, but can we skip 3.3 since JBDS 5 is no longer fully supported?
> d. Will docbook2asciidoc [0] work for batch-converting docbook docs to adoc? @nick will try. If conversion works easily, then converting older User Guides is definitely more doable / less time consuming.
> [0] https://github.com/oreillymedia/docbook2asciidoc
> e. [~xcoulon] Is :page-component_version: still used, eg., in [1], or is the filename version itself used to categorize the content by milestone?
> [1] https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/blob/master/documentatio...
> f. If we decide to continue to include other formats (eg., html-single, pdf) should we link to those from these places [2], [3]?
> [2] http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/overview.html
> [3] http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/luna/4.2.0.Beta1.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.8#6338)
11 years, 4 months