[JBoss JIRA] (JBTIS-312) Generate source bundles for IS component features.
by Paul Leacu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTIS-312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Paul Leacu resolved JBTIS-312.
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.0.0.Beta2
4.2.0.Beta2
Resolution: Done
Fully resolved with 4.2.0.Beta2/ 8.0.0.Beta2.
> Generate source bundles for IS component features.
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBTIS-312
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTIS-312
> Project: JBoss Tools Integration Stack
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Fuse IDE, switchyard, teiid
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Alpha1
> Reporter: Paul Leacu
> Assignee: Paul Leacu
> Fix For: 8.0.0.Beta2, 4.2.0.Beta2
>
>
> IS components must generate source bundles for features that will be aggregated (uncategorized) by JBDSIS.
> Courtesy [~nickboldt]:
> How to make maven/tycho build source bundles and features:
> In the upstream projects:
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Minerva#Source
> Then in the aggregator for JBTIS/JBSIS update site:
> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build-sites/blob/master/aggregat...
> As a result, users can install sources from within JBDS rather than
> needing a separate source zip with .java files. Way more useful, if
> you're a java developer using JBDS/Eclipse.
> If you also want to produce a zip of *actual source files* as pulled
> from github, I have a script for that, too.
> See:
> 1. https://github.com/jbdevstudio/jbdevstudio-product/tree/master/sources
> Produces a zip of the contents of the JBDS product build, so people can
> build it offline. Does NOT include upstream sources.
> Result:
> http://www.qa.jboss.com/binaries/RHDS/builds/staging/devstudio.product_ma...
> (2.4M)
> 2.
> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build-ci/blob/master/publish/pub...
> Produces a zip of upstream sources based on upstream project zips. This
> is the old approach, since pulling a previously-built zip doesn't 100%
> guarantee you're getting the correct version AND it requires that the
> upstream project produce a source zip.
> -OR-
> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build-sites/blob/master/aggregat...
> Fetches sources directly from github based on the source-reference in
> the specified plugins' manifest.mf files, then collates those sources
> into a single zip.
> Results:
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/builds/nightly/core/master/latest/al...
> (35M)
> Ref:
> (10:02:47 AM) maxandersen: pleacu: for core we've just been providing source bundles for the plugins we provide.
> (10:03:55 AM) pleacu: maxandersen, nboldt: sure - and they use tycho to generate them, correct?
> (10:04:21 AM) maxandersen: pleacu: yes - jboss tools parent pom somewhat "enforces" it.
> (10:05:04 AM) pleacu: maxandersen: ok - I'll look at fuse tooling first since I'm most familiar with that
> (10:05:12 AM) maxandersen: pleacu: and nboldt / mistria explicltily aggregates it in uncategorized so it wont show up in default experience.
> (10:06:43 AM) nboldt: pleacu: fuse tooling doesn't do source bundles
> (10:07:07 AM) nboldt: pleacu: see my email in re: "Where can our customer download source code for jbdevstudio-integration-stack-updatesite-7.0.2.GA.zip?" with details about who does and does not yet produce sources
> (10:08:20 AM) nboldt: maxandersen: actually, we don't "aggregate it in uncategorized" because that implies we're specifically putting into a category called "uncategorized"
> (10:08:43 AM) nboldt: maxandersen: rather, it's just added to the category.xml w/o setting <category>: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build-sites/blob/master/aggregat... (cc: pleacu )
> Components that generate source bundles:
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/integration/kepler/integrati...
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/kepler/integration-st...
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/kepler/integration-st...
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/kepler/integration-st...
> Some that don't:
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/integration/kepler/integrati...
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/integration/kepler/integrati...
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/kepler/integration-st...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18953) Unexpected JAX-RS validation error for client filters
by Xavier Coulon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Xavier Coulon commented on JBIDE-18953:
---------------------------------------
[~baciuv],
sorry no, 4.2.1.Final is already packaged and is due today.
What you can do for now is set the validation level to 'ignore' for this particular case: go to Preferences>JBoss Tools>JAX-RS>Jax-RS Validator and locate the "Missing Provider implementation" item in the "JAX-RS Provider" section of that page. This should at least remove the false-positive validation error messages until the bug is fixed.
> Unexpected JAX-RS validation error for client filters
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-18953
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18953
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: webservices
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Final
> Reporter: Valentin Baciu
> Assignee: Xavier Coulon
> Fix For: 4.3.0.Alpha1
>
>
> We are using JAX-RS client filters in our project. One of the classes looks like this:
> ...
> import java.io.IOException;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientRequestContext;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientRequestFilter;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientResponseContext;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientResponseFilter;
> import javax.ws.rs.ext.Provider;
> ...
> @Provider
> public class ClientFilter implements ClientRequestFilter, ClientRequestFilter
> {
> ...
> }
> The class is part of a Dynamic Web Project with JAX-RS support turned on.
> The combination of @Provider and either of the ClientRequestFilter or ClientRequestFilter appears to confuse the JAX-RS validator which produces the following error:
> The Provider must implement at least one of the following interfaces: javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyReader, javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyWriter, javax.ws.rs.ext.ExceptionMapper, javax.ws.rs.ext.ReaderInterceptor, javax.ws.rs.ext.WriterInterceptor, javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerRequestFilter, javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerResponseFilter or javax.ws.rs.ext.ContextResolver.
> I suspect the validator needs to be enhanced to also accept the two client filter interfaces when checking the @Provider annotation?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBTIS-318) Generate source bundles for IS component features.
by Paul Leacu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTIS-318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Paul Leacu resolved JBTIS-318.
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.0.0.Beta2
4.2.0.Beta2
Resolution: Done
Resolved with latest beta2.
> Generate source bundles for IS component features.
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBTIS-318
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTIS-318
> Project: JBoss Tools Integration Stack
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: drools/ jBPM
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Alpha1, 4.2.0.Alpha1
> Reporter: Paul Leacu
> Assignee: Kris Verlaenen
> Fix For: 8.0.0.Beta2, 4.2.0.Beta2
>
>
> jBPM/ Drools must generate source bundles for features that will be aggregated (uncategorized) by JBDSIS.
> Courtesy [~nickboldt]:
> How to make maven/tycho build source bundles and features:
> In the upstream projects:
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Minerva#Source
> Then in the aggregator for JBTIS/JBSIS update site:
> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build-sites/blob/master/aggregat...
> As a result, users can install sources from within JBDS rather than
> needing a separate source zip with .java files. Way more useful, if
> you're a java developer using JBDS/Eclipse.
> If you also want to produce a zip of *actual source files* as pulled
> from github, I have a script for that, too.
> See:
> 1. https://github.com/jbdevstudio/jbdevstudio-product/tree/master/sources
> Produces a zip of the contents of the JBDS product build, so people can
> build it offline. Does NOT include upstream sources.
> Result:
> http://www.qa.jboss.com/binaries/RHDS/builds/staging/devstudio.product_ma...
> (2.4M)
> 2.
> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build-ci/blob/master/publish/pub...
> Produces a zip of upstream sources based on upstream project zips. This
> is the old approach, since pulling a previously-built zip doesn't 100%
> guarantee you're getting the correct version AND it requires that the
> upstream project produce a source zip.
> -OR-
> https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build-sites/blob/master/aggregat...
> Fetches sources directly from github based on the source-reference in
> the specified plugins' manifest.mf files, then collates those sources
> into a single zip.
> Results:
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/builds/nightly/core/master/latest/al...
> (35M)
> Ref:
> (10:02:47 AM) maxandersen: pleacu: for core we've just been providing source bundles for the plugins we provide.
> (10:03:55 AM) pleacu: maxandersen, nboldt: sure - and they use tycho to generate them, correct?
> (10:04:21 AM) maxandersen: pleacu: yes - jboss tools parent pom somewhat "enforces" it.
> (10:05:04 AM) pleacu: maxandersen: ok - I'll look at fuse tooling first since I'm most familiar with that
> (10:05:12 AM) maxandersen: pleacu: and nboldt / mistria explicltily aggregates it in uncategorized so it wont show up in default experience.
> (10:06:43 AM) nboldt: pleacu: fuse tooling doesn't do source bundles
> (10:07:07 AM) nboldt: pleacu: see my email in re: "Where can our customer download source code for jbdevstudio-integration-stack-updatesite-7.0.2.GA.zip?" with details about who does and does not yet produce sources
> (10:08:20 AM) nboldt: maxandersen: actually, we don't "aggregate it in uncategorized" because that implies we're specifically putting into a category called "uncategorized"
> (10:08:43 AM) nboldt: maxandersen: rather, it's just added to the category.xml w/o setting <category>: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build-sites/blob/master/aggregat... (cc: pleacu )
> Components that generate source bundles:
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/integration/kepler/integrati...
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/kepler/integration-st...
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/kepler/integration-st...
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/kepler/integration-st...
> Some that don't:
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/integration/kepler/integrati...
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/integration/kepler/integrati...
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/stable/kepler/integration-st...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18953) Unexpected JAX-RS validation error for client filters
by Valentin Baciu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Valentin Baciu commented on JBIDE-18953:
----------------------------------------
You're welcome Xavier. Any chance the fix can make it into 4.2.1.Final?
> Unexpected JAX-RS validation error for client filters
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-18953
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18953
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: webservices
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Final
> Reporter: Valentin Baciu
> Assignee: Xavier Coulon
> Fix For: 4.3.0.Alpha1
>
>
> We are using JAX-RS client filters in our project. One of the classes looks like this:
> ...
> import java.io.IOException;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientRequestContext;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientRequestFilter;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientResponseContext;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientResponseFilter;
> import javax.ws.rs.ext.Provider;
> ...
> @Provider
> public class ClientFilter implements ClientRequestFilter, ClientRequestFilter
> {
> ...
> }
> The class is part of a Dynamic Web Project with JAX-RS support turned on.
> The combination of @Provider and either of the ClientRequestFilter or ClientRequestFilter appears to confuse the JAX-RS validator which produces the following error:
> The Provider must implement at least one of the following interfaces: javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyReader, javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyWriter, javax.ws.rs.ext.ExceptionMapper, javax.ws.rs.ext.ReaderInterceptor, javax.ws.rs.ext.WriterInterceptor, javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerRequestFilter, javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerResponseFilter or javax.ws.rs.ext.ContextResolver.
> I suspect the validator needs to be enhanced to also accept the two client filter interfaces when checking the @Provider annotation?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18953) Unexpected JAX-RS validation error for client filters
by Xavier Coulon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Xavier Coulon commented on JBIDE-18953:
---------------------------------------
Thanks for reporting this bug, [~baciuv] !
That's something I definitely need to fix.
> Unexpected JAX-RS validation error for client filters
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-18953
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18953
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: webservices
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Final
> Reporter: Valentin Baciu
> Assignee: Xavier Coulon
> Fix For: 4.3.0.Alpha1
>
>
> We are using JAX-RS client filters in our project. One of the classes looks like this:
> ...
> import java.io.IOException;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientRequestContext;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientRequestFilter;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientResponseContext;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientResponseFilter;
> import javax.ws.rs.ext.Provider;
> ...
> @Provider
> public class ClientFilter implements ClientRequestFilter, ClientRequestFilter
> {
> ...
> }
> The class is part of a Dynamic Web Project with JAX-RS support turned on.
> The combination of @Provider and either of the ClientRequestFilter or ClientRequestFilter appears to confuse the JAX-RS validator which produces the following error:
> The Provider must implement at least one of the following interfaces: javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyReader, javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyWriter, javax.ws.rs.ext.ExceptionMapper, javax.ws.rs.ext.ReaderInterceptor, javax.ws.rs.ext.WriterInterceptor, javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerRequestFilter, javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerResponseFilter or javax.ws.rs.ext.ContextResolver.
> I suspect the validator needs to be enhanced to also accept the two client filter interfaces when checking the @Provider annotation?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18953) Unexpected JAX-RS validation error for client filters
by Xavier Coulon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Xavier Coulon updated JBIDE-18953:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.3.0.Alpha1
> Unexpected JAX-RS validation error for client filters
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-18953
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18953
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: webservices
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Final
> Reporter: Valentin Baciu
> Assignee: Xavier Coulon
> Fix For: 4.3.0.Alpha1
>
>
> We are using JAX-RS client filters in our project. One of the classes looks like this:
> ...
> import java.io.IOException;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientRequestContext;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientRequestFilter;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientResponseContext;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientResponseFilter;
> import javax.ws.rs.ext.Provider;
> ...
> @Provider
> public class ClientFilter implements ClientRequestFilter, ClientRequestFilter
> {
> ...
> }
> The class is part of a Dynamic Web Project with JAX-RS support turned on.
> The combination of @Provider and either of the ClientRequestFilter or ClientRequestFilter appears to confuse the JAX-RS validator which produces the following error:
> The Provider must implement at least one of the following interfaces: javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyReader, javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyWriter, javax.ws.rs.ext.ExceptionMapper, javax.ws.rs.ext.ReaderInterceptor, javax.ws.rs.ext.WriterInterceptor, javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerRequestFilter, javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerResponseFilter or javax.ws.rs.ext.ContextResolver.
> I suspect the validator needs to be enhanced to also accept the two client filter interfaces when checking the @Provider annotation?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18953) Unexpected JAX-RS validation error for client filters
by Xavier Coulon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Xavier Coulon reassigned JBIDE-18953:
-------------------------------------
Assignee: Xavier Coulon
> Unexpected JAX-RS validation error for client filters
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-18953
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18953
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: webservices
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Final
> Reporter: Valentin Baciu
> Assignee: Xavier Coulon
>
> We are using JAX-RS client filters in our project. One of the classes looks like this:
> ...
> import java.io.IOException;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientRequestContext;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientRequestFilter;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientResponseContext;
> import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientResponseFilter;
> import javax.ws.rs.ext.Provider;
> ...
> @Provider
> public class ClientFilter implements ClientRequestFilter, ClientRequestFilter
> {
> ...
> }
> The class is part of a Dynamic Web Project with JAX-RS support turned on.
> The combination of @Provider and either of the ClientRequestFilter or ClientRequestFilter appears to confuse the JAX-RS validator which produces the following error:
> The Provider must implement at least one of the following interfaces: javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyReader, javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyWriter, javax.ws.rs.ext.ExceptionMapper, javax.ws.rs.ext.ReaderInterceptor, javax.ws.rs.ext.WriterInterceptor, javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerRequestFilter, javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerResponseFilter or javax.ws.rs.ext.ContextResolver.
> I suspect the validator needs to be enhanced to also accept the two client filter interfaces when checking the @Provider annotation?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18953) Unexpected JAX-RS validation error for client filters
by Valentin Baciu (JIRA)
Valentin Baciu created JBIDE-18953:
--------------------------------------
Summary: Unexpected JAX-RS validation error for client filters
Key: JBIDE-18953
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18953
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: webservices
Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Final
Reporter: Valentin Baciu
We are using JAX-RS client filters in our project. One of the classes looks like this:
...
import java.io.IOException;
import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientRequestContext;
import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientRequestFilter;
import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientResponseContext;
import javax.ws.rs.client.ClientResponseFilter;
import javax.ws.rs.ext.Provider;
...
@Provider
public class ClientFilter implements ClientRequestFilter, ClientRequestFilter
{
...
}
The class is part of a Dynamic Web Project with JAX-RS support turned on.
The combination of @Provider and either of the ClientRequestFilter or ClientRequestFilter appears to confuse the JAX-RS validator which produces the following error:
The Provider must implement at least one of the following interfaces: javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyReader, javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyWriter, javax.ws.rs.ext.ExceptionMapper, javax.ws.rs.ext.ReaderInterceptor, javax.ws.rs.ext.WriterInterceptor, javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerRequestFilter, javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerResponseFilter or javax.ws.rs.ext.ContextResolver.
I suspect the validator needs to be enhanced to also accept the two client filter interfaces when checking the @Provider annotation?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)
11 years, 4 months