[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-20067) Unable to add second server of the same type via runtime detection.
by Rob Stryker (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Rob Stryker commented on JBIDE-20067:
-------------------------------------
> I have tried this scenario with wildfly 8.2, wildfly 9, wildfly-web 9.
You haven't told me if it works properly for these versions or if its broken for all of them ;) Please try to include a bit more information to aid in a faster response.
> Unable to add second server of the same type via runtime detection.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-20067
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20067
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: runtime-detection
> Affects Versions: 4.3.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Radim Hopp
>
> When adding second server of the same type via runtime detection, error pops up: "Unable to initialize some runtime paths.", "All runtime detectors failed to initialize Wildfly-Web 9.0". The runtime gets added, but the server doesn't.
> I saw no error, when I tried to add them at once. It must be done one after another to see the error.
> I have tried this scenario with wildfly 8.2, wildfly 9, wildfly-web 9.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3463) Headless installer should at least warn when running on Java 7
by Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Max Rydahl Andersen commented on JBDS-3463:
-------------------------------------------
can you attach the installconfig.xml ?
I would say it shouldn't allow any install the UI one wouldn't.
> Headless installer should at least warn when running on Java 7
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBDS-3463
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3463
> Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio)
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: installer
> Affects Versions: 9.0.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Jan Richter
>
> While the GUI installer won't let you complete the installation without choosing Java 8 or higher, the headless installer doesn't care.
> If you give it a config with path to Java 7, it will install everything and set Java 7 as -vm in jbdevstudio.ini. I think it should behave consistently with the GUI or at least warn that the Java I'm installing with is not supported anymore.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-20100) how to make users aware of fuse and other tooling only being available from earlyaccess?
by Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Max Rydahl Andersen commented on JBIDE-20100:
---------------------------------------------
[~mickael_istria] putting more generic text that wont help IMO.
[~jtyrrell] UX were involved and sales and PM teams was invited to comment. This issue would not be here if we actually had a release of Fuse tooling to use with JBDS 8 and then with JBDS 8.1 when it came out That was the plan to start with. Out of my team control.
We will find a way to fix this for JBDS 9 and tell users to use JBDS 7 or 8 as needed.
> how to make users aware of fuse and other tooling only being available from earlyaccess?
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-20100
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20100
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: central
> Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen
>
> [~jtyrrell] find it confusing when he cannot see Fuse and other earlyaccess features immediately on the install page.
> Some comments:
> "I install JBDS 8.1 and click on the JBoss Integration and SOA Development, but where is the Fuse tooling in that list."
> "<without earlyaccess> why doesn’t my screen shot tell me to use an older version of JBDS or something."
> Suggestion:
> "when I picked the Integration Stack a greyed out Fuse IDE thingy in the list of choices, and something like (Select early Access) to enable this feature."
> I'm fine exploring options to show early access features more prominently but would prefer we would not need to treat Fuse "special" so maybe we should have a "Early Access" section at the bottom instead of filtered in between everything else ?
> and for any connectors that has additional/different features just add a "Extra features available in Early access " comment ?
> But what to do when Fuse or others dont even have an earlyaccess out yet ? (like is currently the state for devstudio 9)
> [~crobson], [~aileenc] and [~lhein] got any suggestions ?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18912) Custom deploy dir with remote server using filesystem operations does not work
by Rob Stryker (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Rob Stryker commented on JBIDE-18912:
-------------------------------------
So, I thought I could finally replicate. Nothing was happening. The files were copied, but no deployment.
Then I realized I didn't check the "Expose management port" in the server editor. Once I did that, everything worked fine.
However, I do notice an area for improvement: when the management port is not exposed, the error message is swallowed and not presented to the user. This is obviously bad, as it gives no info for the user to pass on to us.
I'll commit a fix that adds logging of the exception, but, again, I genuinely cannot replicate ;)
> Custom deploy dir with remote server using filesystem operations does not work
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-18912
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18912
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: server
> Affects Versions: 4.2.1.CR1
> Reporter: Martin Malina
> Assignee: Rob Stryker
>
> This is a follow up of JBIDE-17180 and JBIDE-13445 which added the option to add a custom deployment directory if your remote server is using filesystem operations (for management api it's not relevant since the deployment happens directly, no directory is used).
> Unfortunately it does not work. It seems I haven't really tried it when reviewing those other JIRAs because there were other obstacles.
> I tried this several times and still could not get it to work.
> Perhaps it might be worth to try and get this in the final 4.2.1.Final build?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 9 months