June 2015 - jbosstools-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-11436) we should use license features

by Nick Boldt (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-11436 at 6/29/15 2:39 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------- I've updated these PRs and verified that license information shows correctly when installing / after installation, fixing the bug I found above. Base: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-base/pull/420 devdoc: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-devdoc/pull/52 Freemarker example: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-freemarker/pull/36 Arquillian example: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-arquillian/pull/113 To test: 1. build base. 2. build freemarker & arquillian 3. launch a clean Eclipse 4.5 4. Add these sites to Window > Prefs > Update > Avail update sites: http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/development/updates/ file:///home/nboldt/tru/jbosstools-base/site/target/repository file:///home/nboldt/tru/jbosstools-freemarker/site/target/repository file:///home/nboldt/tru/jbosstools-arquillian/site/target/repository 5. Help > Install new > select "all local sites" and then install everything from the freemarker & arquillian sites. Verify license shows the new address: {code}General Counsel, 100 East Davie St., Raleigh NC 27601 USA{code} instead of the old address on Varsity Drive. was (Author: nickboldt): I've updated these PRs and verified that license information shows correctly when installing / after installation, fixing the bug I found above. Base: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-base/pull/420 devdoc: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-devdoc/pull/52 Freemarker example: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-freemarker/pull/36 Arquillian example: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-arquillian/pull/113 > we should use license features > ------------------------------ > > Key: JBIDE-11436 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11436 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 4.3.0.Alpha2 > Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen > Assignee: Mickael Istria > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.3.0.Beta2 > > Attachments: wrong-feature-name-shown-in-p2-install-UI-when-using-license-features.png, wrong-feature-name-shown-when-using-license-features.png > > > See http://relengofthenerds.blogspot.fr/2011/01/implementing-shared-licenses-... for explanation -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3470) Toolbars + Icons unusable on high resolution screens

by Len DiMaggio (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Len DiMaggio commented on JBDS-3470: ------------------------------------ I will see if we can borrow a monitor equivalent to this for the short-term and simultaneously - try to buy one for the QE team in Brno to dedicate to Windows testing. DellTM UltraSharp 24 Ultra HD Monitor - Ultra HD 3840 x 2160 http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&cs=04&l=en&sku... $629 from Dell Support case - https://access.redhat.com/support/cases/#/case/01464315 JIRA - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3470 Upstream: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=382972 > Toolbars + Icons unusable on high resolution screens > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBDS-3470 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3470 > Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ui/branding > Affects Versions: 9.0.0.Beta1 > Environment: Windows + UHD screens > Reporter: Mustafa Musaji > > When using JBDS on UHD screen the toolbar is unusable due to it not being resized and too small to use properly. > Upstream: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=382972 > I'm raising this for QE to ensure we test this in the next release as it was fixed upstream. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-11436) we should use license features

by Nick Boldt (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Nick Boldt commented on JBIDE-11436: ------------------------------------ I've updated these PRs and verified that license information shows correctly when installing / after installation, fixing the bug I found above. Base: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-base/pull/420 devdoc: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-devdoc/pull/52 Freemarker example: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-freemarker/pull/36 Arquillian example: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-arquillian/pull/113 > we should use license features > ------------------------------ > > Key: JBIDE-11436 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11436 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 4.3.0.Alpha2 > Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen > Assignee: Mickael Istria > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.3.0.Beta2 > > Attachments: wrong-feature-name-shown-in-p2-install-UI-when-using-license-features.png, wrong-feature-name-shown-when-using-license-features.png > > > See http://relengofthenerds.blogspot.fr/2011/01/implementing-shared-licenses-... for explanation -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-11436) we should use license features

by Nick Boldt (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-11436 at 6/29/15 2:36 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------- Problems with initial PR: [^wrong-feature-name-shown-in-p2-install-UI-when-using-license-features.png] [^wrong-feature-name-shown-when-using-license-features.png] I think the problem is that the implementation of the license feature.properties simply COPIES everything in the foundation.licence.feature/\*.properties file into the downstream one, so we get multiple definitions of *featureName*, and Eclipse reads the last one. {code} # "featureName" property - name of the feature featureName=Arquillian support (Experimental) ... # "featureName" property - name of the feature featureName=JBoss Tools License feature {code} Solution may be to move some of this metadata from the license feature's .properties file into its .xml file. was (Author: nickboldt): Problems with initial PR: !wrong-feature-name-shown-in-p2-install-UI-when-using-license-features.png! !wrong-feature-name-shown-when-using-license-features.png! I think the problem is that the implementation of the license feature.properties simply COPIES everything in the foundation.licence.feature/*.properties file into the downstream one, so we get multiple definitions of *featureName*, and Eclipse reads the last one. {code} # "featureName" property - name of the feature featureName=Arquillian support (Experimental) ... # "featureName" property - name of the feature featureName=JBoss Tools License feature {code} Solution may be to move some of this metadata from the license feature's .properties file into its .xml file. > we should use license features > ------------------------------ > > Key: JBIDE-11436 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11436 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 4.3.0.Alpha2 > Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen > Assignee: Mickael Istria > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.3.0.Beta2 > > Attachments: wrong-feature-name-shown-in-p2-install-UI-when-using-license-features.png, wrong-feature-name-shown-when-using-license-features.png > > > See http://relengofthenerds.blogspot.fr/2011/01/implementing-shared-licenses-... for explanation -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18274) AS7/WildFly8/EAP6 with oracle java 7 fails to start when bound to your hostname

by Rob Stryker (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Rob Stryker commented on JBIDE-18274: ------------------------------------- [~mmalina] You're going to have to set up a dev-environment and set some breakpoints in the JBT code, because I'm simply unable to replicate this at all. Put breakpoints in WebPortPoller at the locations you'd expect. I'd be happy to be around and assist with your debugging though of course :D But seriously, this baffles me. Do you have proxy or something enabled in eclipse? or do you have proxy enabled for command-line but not for eclipse? That'd be the first place I'd look. > AS7/WildFly8/EAP6 with oracle java 7 fails to start when bound to your hostname > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-18274 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18274 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: server > Affects Versions: 4.2.0.CR1 > Reporter: Martin Malina > Assignee: Rob Stryker > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.3.0.Beta2 > > Attachments: server-adapter.png, server-editor.png, server-logs.png, server-runtime.png > > > This is a follow up of JBIDE-17935 . > Previously, Rob fixed this: > {quote} > I've surprisingly been able to replicate this and it's a race-condition. I'll need to synchronize some variables in this class here. > {quote} > But in this rare case it still fails for me. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (LOCUS-42) Update locus to include jsonschema2pojo-core jar, jaxb-xjc.jar and jaxb-impl.jar.

by Mickael Istria (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/LOCUS-42?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Mickael Istria commented on LOCUS-42: ------------------------------------- current development branch is 1.3.0 (see most recent commit on master). It's built by https://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/view/DevStudio/view/DevS... and published to http://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/unzip/unzip/org/jboss/tools/loc... > Update locus to include jsonschema2pojo-core jar, jaxb-xjc.jar and jaxb-impl.jar. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LOCUS-42 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/LOCUS-42 > Project: JBoss Tools Locus > Issue Type: Feature Request > Affects Versions: 1.2.0 > Reporter: Paul Leacu > Assignee: Paul Leacu > Fix For: 1.3.0 > > > Request three new jars in Locus 1.3.0: > jsonschema2pojo-core jar > jaxb-xjc jar > jaxb-impl jar > Fuse Data Transformation tooling relies on jsonschema2pojo to generate model classes from JSON schema and JSON instance documents. Need to capture the jar in locus for inclusion into JBTIS target platform and ultimately Data Transformation tooling (Fuse). > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jsonschema2pojo/jsonschema2pojo-core/0... > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jsonschema2pojo/jsonschema2pojo-core/0... > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/bind/jaxb-xjc/2.2.7/jaxb-xjc-2... > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/bind/jaxb-xjc/2.2.7/jaxb-xjc-2... > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/bind/jaxb-impl/2.2.7/jaxb-impl... > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/bind/jaxb-impl/2.2.7/jaxb-impl... > This is needed for Mars/ 9.0.x JBDSIS target platform inclusion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-11436) we should use license features

by Mickael Istria (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Mickael Istria commented on JBIDE-11436: ---------------------------------------- Right. The License feature shouldn't specify a featureName nor a featureDescription, Those still need to be set by specific features. > we should use license features > ------------------------------ > > Key: JBIDE-11436 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11436 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 4.3.0.Alpha2 > Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen > Assignee: Mickael Istria > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.3.0.Beta2 > > Attachments: wrong-feature-name-shown-in-p2-install-UI-when-using-license-features.png, wrong-feature-name-shown-when-using-license-features.png > > > See http://relengofthenerds.blogspot.fr/2011/01/implementing-shared-licenses-... for explanation -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (LOCUS-42) Update locus to include jsonschema2pojo-core jar, jaxb-xjc.jar and jaxb-impl.jar.

by Paul Leacu (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/LOCUS-42?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Paul Leacu commented on LOCUS-42: --------------------------------- [~mickael_istria] - what's the version branch for the next mars locus release? Is it still 1.3.0.Final? 1.3.1.?? Thkx > Update locus to include jsonschema2pojo-core jar, jaxb-xjc.jar and jaxb-impl.jar. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LOCUS-42 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/LOCUS-42 > Project: JBoss Tools Locus > Issue Type: Feature Request > Affects Versions: 1.2.0 > Reporter: Paul Leacu > Assignee: Paul Leacu > Fix For: 1.3.0 > > > Request three new jars in Locus 1.3.0: > jsonschema2pojo-core jar > jaxb-xjc jar > jaxb-impl jar > Fuse Data Transformation tooling relies on jsonschema2pojo to generate model classes from JSON schema and JSON instance documents. Need to capture the jar in locus for inclusion into JBTIS target platform and ultimately Data Transformation tooling (Fuse). > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jsonschema2pojo/jsonschema2pojo-core/0... > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jsonschema2pojo/jsonschema2pojo-core/0... > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/bind/jaxb-xjc/2.2.7/jaxb-xjc-2... > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/bind/jaxb-xjc/2.2.7/jaxb-xjc-2... > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/bind/jaxb-impl/2.2.7/jaxb-impl... > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/bind/jaxb-impl/2.2.7/jaxb-impl... > This is needed for Mars/ 9.0.x JBDSIS target platform inclusion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-11436) we should use license features

by Nick Boldt (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Nick Boldt updated JBIDE-11436: ------------------------------- Attachment: wrong-feature-name-shown-in-p2-install-UI-when-using-license-features.png wrong-feature-name-shown-when-using-license-features.png Problems with initial PR: !wrong-feature-name-shown-in-p2-install-UI-when-using-license-features.png! !wrong-feature-name-shown-when-using-license-features.png! I think the problem is that the implementation of the license feature.properties simply COPIES everything in the foundation.licence.feature/*.properties file into the downstream one, so we get multiple definitions of *featureName*, and Eclipse reads the last one. {code} # "featureName" property - name of the feature featureName=Arquillian support (Experimental) ... # "featureName" property - name of the feature featureName=JBoss Tools License feature {code} Solution may be to move some of this metadata from the license feature's .properties file into its .xml file. > we should use license features > ------------------------------ > > Key: JBIDE-11436 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11436 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 4.3.0.Alpha2 > Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen > Assignee: Mickael Istria > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.3.0.Beta2 > > Attachments: wrong-feature-name-shown-in-p2-install-UI-when-using-license-features.png, wrong-feature-name-shown-when-using-license-features.png > > > See http://relengofthenerds.blogspot.fr/2011/01/implementing-shared-licenses-... for explanation -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-11436) we should use license features

by Nick Boldt (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-11436 at 6/29/15 1:27 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------- PR for Arquillian, showing removal of license.html changes to feature.properties: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-arquillian/pull/113 was (Author: nickboldt): PR for Arquillian: https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-arquillian/pull/113 > we should use license features > ------------------------------ > > Key: JBIDE-11436 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11436 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: build > Affects Versions: 4.3.0.Alpha2 > Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen > Assignee: Mickael Istria > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.3.0.Beta2 > > > See http://relengofthenerds.blogspot.fr/2011/01/implementing-shared-licenses-... for explanation -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jbosstools-issues June 2015