[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-24868) Server adapter: Switch off pod livenessProbe.periodSecond property and router timeout during debug session
by Andre Dietisheim (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Andre Dietisheim commented on JBIDE-24868:
------------------------------------------
If I get things right changing the router timeout seems non-available to the non-admin user.
Then it seems as if we could forward the ports from the ports directly (not connecting via the router). I believe that this is what we're doing currently: {code:title=https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-openshift/blob/master/plugins/org.jboss.tools.openshift.core/src/org/jboss/tools/openshift/core/server/behavior/OpenShiftLaunchController.java#L360}
Set<PortPair> podPorts = PortForwardingUtils.getForwardablePorts(pod);
{code}
So far I believe that we're not affected by the timeout in the router. But then, it this scenario there's apparently a timeout in the port-forwaring, too, as discussed here: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-23422?focusedCommentId=13334141&pag.... In arquillian they add a keep-alive ping, something we cannot do since we use oc to forward the ports and thus are not in control of that socket. I believe that we should reach out to openshift for advice how to tackle this since it makes debugging pretty useless.
[~rhuss] [~jeffmaury] [~aurelien.pupier] Thoughts?
> Server adapter: Switch off pod livenessProbe.periodSecond property and router timeout during debug session
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-24868
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24868
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: openshift
> Reporter: Aurélien Pupier
> Assignee: Andre Dietisheim
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: openshift_v3, server_adapter
> Fix For: 4.5.x
>
>
> it will avoid to have "debug connections always killed after 30s staying in a breakpoint"
> see https://twitter.com/ro14nd/status/895886024387067904 for source of suggestion
> k8 documentations on the matter are here: https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-livene...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-24903) Sonar: report correct test coverage (by using a build that does not use pack2000)
by Dmitrii Bocharov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Dmitrii Bocharov reassigned JBIDE-24903:
----------------------------------------
Assignee: Dmitrii Bocharov
[~adietish] ok, taking it. Thank you!
> Sonar: report correct test coverage (by using a build that does not use pack2000)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-24903
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24903
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: openshift
> Affects Versions: 4.5.1.AM1
> Reporter: Andre Dietisheim
> Assignee: Dmitrii Bocharov
> Labels: build, sonar, test, test-coverage
> Fix For: 4.5.x
>
> Attachments: image-2017-08-29-14-07-45-069.png, image-2017-08-29-14-11-01-604.png
>
>
> Currently our [Sonar instance|https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=org.jboss.tools%3Aopenshift] erroneously reports our test coverage with 0.8%
> !image-2017-08-29-14-07-45-069.png!
> According to [~lhein] this is caused by the fact that we build using pack200. In Fuse Tools they added a build in jenkins just for sonar, which is *NOT* using pack200 and their [sonar analysis|https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=fusetools] therefore reports their test coverage more accurately at 29%
> !image-2017-08-29-14-11-01-604.png!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-24903) Sonar: report correct test coverage (by using a build that does not use pack2000)
by Aurélien Pupier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Aurélien Pupier updated JBIDE-24903:
------------------------------------
Description:
Currently our [Sonar instance|https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=org.jboss.tools%3Aopenshift] erroneously reports our test coverage with 0.8%
!image-2017-08-29-14-07-45-069.png!
According to [~lhein] this is caused by the fact that we build using pack200. In Fuse Tools they added a build in jenkins just for sonar, which is *NOT* using pack200 and their [sonar analysis|https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=fusetools] therefore reports their test coverage more accurately at 29%
!image-2017-08-29-14-11-01-604.png!
was:
Currently our [Sonar instance|https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=org.jboss.tools%3Aopenshift] erroneously reports our test coverage with 0.8%
!image-2017-08-29-14-07-45-069.png!
According to [~lhein] this is caused by the fact that we build using pack2000. In Fuse Tools they added a build in jenkins just for sonar, which is *NOT* using pack2000 and their [sonar analysis|https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=fusetools] therefore reports their test coverage more accurately at 29%
!image-2017-08-29-14-11-01-604.png!
> Sonar: report correct test coverage (by using a build that does not use pack2000)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-24903
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24903
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: openshift
> Affects Versions: 4.5.1.AM1
> Reporter: Andre Dietisheim
> Labels: build, sonar, test, test-coverage
> Fix For: 4.5.x
>
> Attachments: image-2017-08-29-14-07-45-069.png, image-2017-08-29-14-11-01-604.png
>
>
> Currently our [Sonar instance|https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=org.jboss.tools%3Aopenshift] erroneously reports our test coverage with 0.8%
> !image-2017-08-29-14-07-45-069.png!
> According to [~lhein] this is caused by the fact that we build using pack200. In Fuse Tools they added a build in jenkins just for sonar, which is *NOT* using pack200 and their [sonar analysis|https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=fusetools] therefore reports their test coverage more accurately at 29%
> !image-2017-08-29-14-11-01-604.png!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-24903) Sonar: report correct test coverage (by using a build that does not use pack2000)
by Andre Dietisheim (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Andre Dietisheim updated JBIDE-24903:
-------------------------------------
Labels: build sonar test test-coverage (was: )
> Sonar: report correct test coverage (by using a build that does not use pack2000)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-24903
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24903
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: openshift
> Affects Versions: 4.5.1.AM1
> Reporter: Andre Dietisheim
> Labels: build, sonar, test, test-coverage
> Fix For: 4.5.x
>
> Attachments: image-2017-08-29-14-07-45-069.png, image-2017-08-29-14-11-01-604.png
>
>
> Currently our [Sonar instance|https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=org.jboss.tools%3Aopenshift] erroneously reports our test coverage with 0.8%
> !image-2017-08-29-14-07-45-069.png!
> According to [~lhein] this is caused by the fact that we build using pack2000. In Fuse Tools they added a build in jenkins just for sonar, which is *NOT* using pack2000 and their [sonar analysis|https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=fusetools] therefore reports their test coverage more accurately at 29%
> !image-2017-08-29-14-11-01-604.png!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-24903) Sonar: report correct test coverage (by using a build that does not use pack2000)
by Andre Dietisheim (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Andre Dietisheim commented on JBIDE-24903:
------------------------------------------
[~dbocharov] is this something you'd be willing to tackle since you're the one with the most knowledge about sonar in our team?
> Sonar: report correct test coverage (by using a build that does not use pack2000)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-24903
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24903
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: openshift
> Affects Versions: 4.5.1.AM1
> Reporter: Andre Dietisheim
> Fix For: 4.5.x
>
> Attachments: image-2017-08-29-14-07-45-069.png, image-2017-08-29-14-11-01-604.png
>
>
> Currently our [Sonar instance|https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=org.jboss.tools%3Aopenshift] erroneously reports our test coverage with 0.8%
> !image-2017-08-29-14-07-45-069.png!
> According to [~lhein] this is caused by the fact that we build using pack2000. In Fuse Tools they added a build in jenkins just for sonar, which is *NOT* using pack2000 and their [sonar analysis|https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=fusetools] therefore reports their test coverage more accurately at 29%
> !image-2017-08-29-14-11-01-604.png!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-24903) Sonar: report correct test coverage (by using a build that does not use pack2000)
by Andre Dietisheim (JIRA)
Andre Dietisheim created JBIDE-24903:
----------------------------------------
Summary: Sonar: report correct test coverage (by using a build that does not use pack2000)
Key: JBIDE-24903
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24903
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Task
Components: openshift
Affects Versions: 4.5.1.AM1
Reporter: Andre Dietisheim
Fix For: 4.5.x
Attachments: image-2017-08-29-14-07-45-069.png, image-2017-08-29-14-11-01-604.png
Currently our [Sonar instance|https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=org.jboss.tools%3Aopenshift] erroneously reports our test coverage with 0.8%
!image-2017-08-29-14-07-45-069.png!
According to [~lhein] this is caused by the fact that we build using pack2000. In Fuse Tools they added a build in jenkins just for sonar, which is *NOT* using pack2000 and their [sonar analysis|https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=fusetools] therefore reports their test coverage more accurately at 29%
!image-2017-08-29-14-11-01-604.png!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 7 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-24883) Python on windows slaves
by Pavol Srna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Pavol Srna updated JBIDE-24883:
-------------------------------
Story Points: 8
> Python on windows slaves
> -------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-24883
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24883
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: qa
> Reporter: Pavol Srna
> Assignee: Pavol Srna
> Labels: central-ci
> Fix For: 4.5.1.AM2
>
>
> python installation needs to be scripted in mwqa-cloud-slaves to be installed automatically when provisioning from openstack.
> Purpose: facilitate running cross-platform scripts (eg., for JDK detection & discovery). Will allow Nick to start porting .sh script to .py so they can be used on all OSes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 7 months