[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-26180) TP: create target platform based on Eclipse 4.9 (Simrel 2018-09)
by Nick Boldt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Nick Boldt commented on JBIDE-26180:
------------------------------------
[~odockal] Please consider asking for stuff before the code freeze. :D
Had you told me about this on Wednesday, I could have picked it up (and we'd have seen all the places that a new RD breaks Docker Tooling and JBoss Tools tests plugins.
Anyway, I'll grab newer RD for the next TP update planned for M3. `For sprint 154 / AM3: simrel M3`
> TP: create target platform based on Eclipse 4.9 (Simrel 2018-09)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-26180
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26180
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: target-platform, upstream
> Affects Versions: 4.9.0.AM1
> Reporter: Nick Boldt
> Assignee: Nick Boldt
> Fix For: 4.9.0.AM1, 4.9.0.AM2, 4.9.0.AM3, 4.9.0.Final
>
> Attachments: am1-vs-am2.p2diff.txt
>
>
> In order to start Eclipse 4.9-based builds, we need an updated target platform.
> For sprint 152 / AM1: simrel M1
> For sprint 153 / AM2: simrel M2
> For sprint 154 / AM3: simrel M3
> For sprint 155 / GA: simrel RC2/GA
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
6 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-26305) Jars inside an EAR application are not compressed
by Rick Wagner (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Rick Wagner commented on JBIDE-26305:
-------------------------------------
Hi [~mmalina], [~rob.stryker]
Ok, that helps explains things. Thanks for that.
The support case is closed, but the customer has been given the link to this tracker, so the above has been communicated through this channel.
I'll investigate further and will pursue future remedies via EAP.
Rick
> Jars inside an EAR application are not compressed
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-26305
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26305
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: server
> Reporter: Martin Malina
> Assignee: Rob Stryker
>
> A customer has reported an issue where an ear project, when deployed to EAP 7.1, contains exploded jars which then breaks his app. It seems that in his case it happens both in the case of a jar inside a war inside an ear, as well as just a jar inside an ear.
> Also, when the customer deploys the same app in the same workspace and same eclipse to EAP 6.4, it works fine - all the jars are zipped.
> The customer reports that he can change this behavior in the Deployments tab of the server editor, but it would be nice to be able to define this beforehand in a config file.
> I tried to reproduce this in devstudio 12 and in my case the behavior was the same with both EAP 6.4 and 7.1 - in both cases an included jar was exploded which I think is wrong.
> So two main things to consider:
> 1. Is this a bug? I believe it is - a jar lib should always be zipped by default. Or do you disagree?
> 2. Is there a way to specify if a module of an EAP is zipped or not in a config file? If not, can this be added?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
6 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-26276) Create PR check job for RSP (Runtime Server Protocol)
by Martin Malina (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Martin Malina commented on JBIDE-26276:
---------------------------------------
Thanks, [~rob.stryker]. In theory that should be it. But for some reason it doesn't seem to work.
[~jrichter1], can you help us?
The job is here: https://dev-platform-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/view/Adapter...
It's configured to use the new repo and here's a testing PR: https://github.com/redhat-developer/rsp-server/pull/4
The job got triggered. But there is nothing displayed on the PR page.
>From the console output it seems that the user does not have permissions, but Rob says he's added the user as a collaborator:
{code}
FileNotFoundException means that the credentials Jenkins is using is probably wrong. Or the user account does not have write access to the repo.
org.kohsuke.github.GHFileNotFoundException: {"message":"Not Found","documentation_url":"https://developer.github.com/v3/repos/statuses/#create-a-status"}
at org.kohsuke.github.Requester.handleApiError(Requester.java:686)
at org.kohsuke.github.Requester._to(Requester.java:293)
at org.kohsuke.github.Requester.to(Requester.java:234)
at org.kohsuke.github.GHRepository.createCommitStatus(GHRepository.java:1075)
at org.jenkinsci.plugins.ghprb.extensions.status.GhprbSimpleStatus.createCommitStatus(GhprbSimpleStatus.java:272)
at org.jenkinsci.plugins.ghprb.extensions.status.GhprbSimpleStatus.onBuildComplete(GhprbSimpleStatus.java:231)
at org.jenkinsci.plugins.ghprb.GhprbBuilds.onCompleted(GhprbBuilds.java:192)
at org.jenkinsci.plugins.ghprb.GhprbBuildListener.onCompleted(GhprbBuildListener.java:26)
at hudson.model.listeners.RunListener.fireCompleted(RunListener.java:211)
at hudson.model.Run.execute(Run.java:1780)
at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:43)
at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:97)
at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:405)
Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: https://api.github.com/repos/redhat-developer/rsp-server/statuses/b8de445...
at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor1805.newInstance(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:423)
at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection$10.run(HttpURLConnection.java:1926)
at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection$10.run(HttpURLConnection.java:1921)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getChainedException(HttpURLConnection.java:1920)
at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream0(HttpURLConnection.java:1490)
at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(HttpURLConnection.java:1474)
at sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsURLConnectionImpl.getInputStream(HttpsURLConnectionImpl.java:254)
at org.kohsuke.github.Requester.parse(Requester.java:612)
at org.kohsuke.github.Requester.parse(Requester.java:594)
at org.kohsuke.github.Requester._to(Requester.java:272)
... 11 more
Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: https://api.github.com/repos/redhat-developer/rsp-server/statuses/b8de445...
at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream0(HttpURLConnection.java:1872)
at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(HttpURLConnection.java:1474)
at java.net.HttpURLConnection.getResponseCode(HttpURLConnection.java:480)
at sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsURLConnectionImpl.getResponseCode(HttpsURLConnectionImpl.java:338)
at org.kohsuke.github.Requester.parse(Requester.java:602)
... 13 more
success
{code}
Do you have a clue what could be wrong here?
> Create PR check job for RSP (Runtime Server Protocol)
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-26276
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26276
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: runtime-server-protocol
> Reporter: Pavol Srna
> Assignee: Martin Malina
> Fix For: 4.9.0.AM2
>
>
> https://github.com/robstryker/org.jboss.tools.ssp/blob/master/Jenkinsfile
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
6 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-26305) Jars inside an EAR application are not compressed
by Martin Malina (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Martin Malina commented on JBIDE-26305:
---------------------------------------
Thanks, [~rob.stryker], for the detailed explanation. Note that I was merely trying to present what the customer was struggling with. And at the first sight it seemed wrong that a jar would ever be exploded, my intuition said it was wrong. If it indeed was wrong, then the default should be always zipped for jars. But since you say that WildFly should support deployment of exploded jars with no problem, then I agree with you that if the deployment indeed breaks for exploded jar and works with zipped jar for the customer, then that seems like a problem with the app server and not devstudio.
[~rick_wagner], can you relay Rob's explanation to the customer and let us know if there's anything we can do? Right now it seems like it could be a problem with EAP itself.
> Jars inside an EAR application are not compressed
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-26305
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26305
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: server
> Reporter: Martin Malina
> Assignee: Rob Stryker
>
> A customer has reported an issue where an ear project, when deployed to EAP 7.1, contains exploded jars which then breaks his app. It seems that in his case it happens both in the case of a jar inside a war inside an ear, as well as just a jar inside an ear.
> Also, when the customer deploys the same app in the same workspace and same eclipse to EAP 6.4, it works fine - all the jars are zipped.
> The customer reports that he can change this behavior in the Deployments tab of the server editor, but it would be nice to be able to define this beforehand in a config file.
> I tried to reproduce this in devstudio 12 and in my case the behavior was the same with both EAP 6.4 and 7.1 - in both cases an included jar was exploded which I think is wrong.
> So two main things to consider:
> 1. Is this a bug? I believe it is - a jar lib should always be zipped by default. Or do you disagree?
> 2. Is there a way to specify if a module of an EAP is zipped or not in a config file? If not, can this be added?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
6 years, 2 months