September 2018 - jbosstools-issues

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-26180) TP: create target platform based on Eclipse 4.9 (Simrel 2018-09)

by Fred Bricon (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Fred Bricon updated JBIDE-26180: -------------------------------- Description: In order to start Eclipse 4.9-based builds, we need an updated target platform. For sprint 152 / AM1: simrel M1 For sprint 153 / AM2: simrel M2 For sprint 154 / AM3: simrel M3 For sprint 155 / GA: simrel RC2/GA Coming in the next update, some orbit changes: * batik, icu4j, platform, felix gogo, httpclient (due 27 Aug) Also: * reddeer 2.3 * m2e http://download.eclipse.org/technology/m2e/releases/1.9/1.9.1.20180912-1601/ was: In order to start Eclipse 4.9-based builds, we need an updated target platform. For sprint 152 / AM1: simrel M1 For sprint 153 / AM2: simrel M2 For sprint 154 / AM3: simrel M3 For sprint 155 / GA: simrel RC2/GA Coming in the next update, some orbit changes: * batik, icu4j, platform, felix gogo, httpclient (due 27 Aug) Also: * reddeer 2.3 * m2e http://download.eclipse.org/technology/m2e/milestones/1.9/1.9.1.20180829-... > TP: create target platform based on Eclipse 4.9 (Simrel 2018-09) > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-26180 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26180 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: target-platform, upstream > Affects Versions: 4.9.0.AM1 > Reporter: Nick Boldt > Assignee: Nick Boldt > Labels: releasework > Fix For: 4.9.0.Final > > Attachments: am1-vs-am2.p2diff.txt, p2diff.am2.am3.all.ignoreVersions.txt, p2diff.am2.am3.all.txt > > > In order to start Eclipse 4.9-based builds, we need an updated target platform. > For sprint 152 / AM1: simrel M1 > For sprint 153 / AM2: simrel M2 > For sprint 154 / AM3: simrel M3 > For sprint 155 / GA: simrel RC2/GA > Coming in the next update, some orbit changes: > * batik, icu4j, platform, felix gogo, httpclient (due 27 Aug) > Also: > * reddeer 2.3 > * m2e http://download.eclipse.org/technology/m2e/releases/1.9/1.9.1.20180912-1601/ -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-26379) Launcher: should be moved from base to central

by Jeff MAURY (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Jeff MAURY commented on JBIDE-26379: ------------------------------------ I just meant that if this is a simple move it can be done but if you start renaming bundles and features then you will probably rename the packages and then it's another story > Launcher: should be moved from base to central > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-26379 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26379 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: central, common > Affects Versions: 4.9.0.AM3 > Reporter: Andre Dietisheim > Labels: launcher_wizard > > as discussed in https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-base/pull/631#issuecomment-42109... > {quote} > This should all live in central, and it shouldn't really be added to the common.all feature if we intend to simply move it later. > Give it it's own feature, add it to the master list of features added to the project, and then later move it to the central repo. > I personally believe a rename-and-move is just fine even before a Final. Keeping it where it is through a final actually is what's harder to change. Then it becomes a sort of API that the common.all feature contains this launcher, and later it won't. > {quote} > we should move the launcher from jbosstools-base to jbosstools-central -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-26379) Launcher: should be moved from base to central

by Andre Dietisheim (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Andre Dietisheim commented on JBIDE-26379: ------------------------------------------ [~jeffmaury] so in your opinion there's nothing to be done before final, leaving the rename to after GA? > Launcher: should be moved from base to central > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-26379 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26379 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: central, common > Affects Versions: 4.9.0.AM3 > Reporter: Andre Dietisheim > Labels: launcher_wizard > > as discussed in https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-base/pull/631#issuecomment-42109... > {quote} > This should all live in central, and it shouldn't really be added to the common.all feature if we intend to simply move it later. > Give it it's own feature, add it to the master list of features added to the project, and then later move it to the central repo. > I personally believe a rename-and-move is just fine even before a Final. Keeping it where it is through a final actually is what's harder to change. Then it becomes a sort of API that the common.all feature contains this launcher, and later it won't. > {quote} > we should move the launcher from jbosstools-base to jbosstools-central -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-26378) Update hibernate tools dependency of org.jboss.tools.hibernate.runtime.v_5_1 to version 5.1.10.Final

by Koen Aers (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Koen Aers updated JBIDE-26378: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 4.9.0.Final > Update hibernate tools dependency of org.jboss.tools.hibernate.runtime.v_5_1 to version 5.1.10.Final > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-26378 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26378 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Task > Components: hibernate > Affects Versions: 4.9.0.AM3 > Reporter: Koen Aers > Assignee: Koen Aers > Fix For: 4.9.0.Final > > > This includes updating the dependency on hibernate core to version 5.1.16.Final -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-26379) Launcher: should be moved from base to central

by Jeff MAURY (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Jeff MAURY commented on JBIDE-26379: ------------------------------------ Moving is another story unless you decide not to rename the plugins/features > Launcher: should be moved from base to central > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-26379 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26379 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: central, common > Affects Versions: 4.9.0.AM3 > Reporter: Andre Dietisheim > Labels: launcher_wizard > > as discussed in https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-base/pull/631#issuecomment-42109... > {quote} > This should all live in central, and it shouldn't really be added to the common.all feature if we intend to simply move it later. > Give it it's own feature, add it to the master list of features added to the project, and then later move it to the central repo. > I personally believe a rename-and-move is just fine even before a Final. Keeping it where it is through a final actually is what's harder to change. Then it becomes a sort of API that the common.all feature contains this launcher, and later it won't. > {quote} > we should move the launcher from jbosstools-base to jbosstools-central -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-26379) Launcher: should be moved from base to central

by Jeff MAURY (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Jeff MAURY commented on JBIDE-26379: ------------------------------------ There's already a specific feature for those plugins. I added them to commons.all because I thought it would make them available to JBoss Tools update site and DeveloperStudio installer but it was false > Launcher: should be moved from base to central > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-26379 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26379 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: central, common > Affects Versions: 4.9.0.AM3 > Reporter: Andre Dietisheim > Labels: launcher_wizard > > as discussed in https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-base/pull/631#issuecomment-42109... > {quote} > This should all live in central, and it shouldn't really be added to the common.all feature if we intend to simply move it later. > Give it it's own feature, add it to the master list of features added to the project, and then later move it to the central repo. > I personally believe a rename-and-move is just fine even before a Final. Keeping it where it is through a final actually is what's harder to change. Then it becomes a sort of API that the common.all feature contains this launcher, and later it won't. > {quote} > we should move the launcher from jbosstools-base to jbosstools-central -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-26379) Launcher: should be moved from base to central

by Andre Dietisheim (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Andre Dietisheim commented on JBIDE-26379: ------------------------------------------ [~jeffmaury] I guess we should remove the plugins from the commons.all feature and add it to it's very own feature before 4.9.0.Final. Moving can then be done after GA. Agree? > Launcher: should be moved from base to central > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-26379 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26379 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: central, common > Affects Versions: 4.9.0.AM3 > Reporter: Andre Dietisheim > Labels: launcher_wizard > > as discussed in https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-base/pull/631#issuecomment-42109... > {quote} > This should all live in central, and it shouldn't really be added to the common.all feature if we intend to simply move it later. > Give it it's own feature, add it to the master list of features added to the project, and then later move it to the central repo. > I personally believe a rename-and-move is just fine even before a Final. Keeping it where it is through a final actually is what's harder to change. Then it becomes a sort of API that the common.all feature contains this launcher, and later it won't. > {quote} > we should move the launcher from jbosstools-base to jbosstools-central -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-26380) Pod log: does not work if oc is configured at the connection level

by Andre Dietisheim (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Andre Dietisheim updated JBIDE-26380: ------------------------------------- Story Points: 3 > Pod log: does not work if oc is configured at the connection level > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: JBIDE-26380 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26380 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: openshift > Affects Versions: 4.9.0.AM3 > Reporter: Jeff MAURY > Assignee: Andre Dietisheim > Labels: connection, oc_binary, pod_log > Fix For: 4.9.0.Final > > Attachments: screenshot-1.png > > > ASSERT: no oc configured at the workspace level > ASSERT: oc is configured at the connection level > ASSERT: have a pod running > ASSERT: execute the pod log command > EXPECTED: pod log is shown > Instead, a dialog is shown claiming there is an issue with the oc client -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-26380) Pod log: does not work if oc is configured at the connection level

by Andre Dietisheim (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Andre Dietisheim updated JBIDE-26380: ------------------------------------- Summary: Pod log: does not work if oc is configured at the connection level (was: pod log command does not work if oc is configured at the connection level) > Pod log: does not work if oc is configured at the connection level > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: JBIDE-26380 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26380 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: openshift > Affects Versions: 4.9.0.AM3 > Reporter: Jeff MAURY > Assignee: Andre Dietisheim > Labels: connection, oc_binary, pod_log > Fix For: 4.9.0.Final > > Attachments: screenshot-1.png > > > ASSERT: no oc configured at the workspace level > ASSERT: oc is configured at the connection level > ASSERT: have a pod running > ASSERT: execute the pod log command > EXPECTED: pod log is shown > Instead, a dialog is shown claiming there is an issue with the oc client -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-26380) pod log command does not work if oc is configured at the connection level

by Andre Dietisheim (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Andre Dietisheim updated JBIDE-26380: ------------------------------------- Labels: connection oc_binary pod_log (was: ) > pod log command does not work if oc is configured at the connection level > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-26380 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-26380 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: openshift > Affects Versions: 4.9.0.AM3 > Reporter: Jeff MAURY > Assignee: Andre Dietisheim > Labels: connection, oc_binary, pod_log > Fix For: 4.9.0.Final > > Attachments: screenshot-1.png > > > ASSERT: no oc configured at the workspace level > ASSERT: oc is configured at the connection level > ASSERT: have a pod running > ASSERT: execute the pod log command > EXPECTED: pod log is shown > Instead, a dialog is shown claiming there is an issue with the oc client -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

6 years

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jbosstools-issues September 2018