]
Nick Boldt updated JBDS-1636:
-----------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.0.0.M2
(was: 5.0.0.M1)
fix copyrights in all features
------------------------------
Key: JBDS-1636
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-1636
Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Build, documentation, Requirements
Affects Versions: 4.1.0.M1, 5.0.0.M1
Reporter: Nick Boldt
Assignee: Nick Boldt
Fix For: 4.1.0.CR1, 5.0.0.M2
From Richard Fontana:
> If you are under general instructions to use "JBoss by Red Hat" for
marketing or branding purposes that's fine.
> The one place where it is not formally correct is in copyright
statements themselves. Those should at least say "Copyright <year> Red
Hat, Inc." (or, as I often recommend for JBoss source code files,
"Copyright <year> Red Hat, Inc. and/or its affiliates".
> The 'provider name' by contrast doesn't matter from a legal
perspective. It doesn't matter to me if there's some inconsistency
between provider name and copyright holder name.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: