[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-2112) should jbpm5 be included in both SOA and Business Rules connectors / categories?

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-2112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] RH Bugzilla Integration commented on JBDS-2112: ----------------------------------------------- JBoss JIRA Server <jira-update(a)redhat.com&gt; made a comment on [bug 811981|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811981] Ken Johnson <kejohnso(a)redhat.com&gt; made a comment on jira JBDS-2046 Comments on a few of the above entries: First on the JBDS SOA Update site above. 1. I don't think "SOA-P" means anything to customers. It's a very internal term. Suggest simply "SOA" since we've done away with the old collection named with "SOA" 2. The ModeShape tools go under JBoss Data Servcies rather than SOA Second on the most recent screenshots above. They look good and are less confusing. Couple points: 1. Do you think users get the difference between "Project Tooling" and "Product Tooling". Assuming your eyes pick up the subtle wording, does that carry significant meaning to users? Should it be "Community Project Tooling" and "Product Tooling" or a similar distinction? Or maybe it's "JBoss Tooling by Project" vs "JBoss Tools by Product"? Maybe splitting hairs a bit. 2. Under Product we have two products SOA-P and BRMS. There are actually 3 products: SOA Platform, Data Services Platform and BRMS. Rather than creating a new product category, perhaps rename the "SOA-P Tooling" to "SOA and Data Services Tooling". Since Data Services is a superset this makes more sense than breaking them out. Here the Teiid and ModeShape tools would be under "SOA and Data Services Tooling" with ESB, jBPM 3, BPEL, etc. Thoughts? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira