]
Brian Fitzpatrick updated JBIDE-6178:
-------------------------------------
Original Estimate: 0 minutes
Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
Fix Version/s: LATER
3.3.x
(was: 3.2.x)
Prefix existing feature/plugins descriptions/names with
"JBoss"
---------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBIDE-6178
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-6178
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: updatesite
Affects Versions: 3.1.0.GA
Reporter: Darryl Miles
Assignee: Nick Boldt
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 3.1.x, 3.3.x, LATER
Attachments: 20100413_jboss_example1.PNG
Original Estimate: 0 minutes
Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
Please consider the impact of users using the "All Update Site" view when
installing JBoss plugins.
Some rules to consider:
1) If JBoss creates a new top-level group (which consists entirely of JBoss features)
then that top-level name should begin with the word "JBoss".
2) If JBoss reuses a top-level group which belongs to another vendor (for which JBT is
built on top of, for example BIRT/Maven/DTP) then you can reuse the top-level group name
of the outside vendor, but ensure your features underneath are prefixed with the word
"JBoss"."
In enclose a screen grab from 3.1.0.GA which indicates the discrepancy; BIRT is following
the above rules, but "Maven Support" is not (and also "Data Services"
top level group is not).
The "All in one JBoss" top-level group doesn't really need to follow this
convention, since the top level group clearly indicates it is from JBoss and entirely
contains JBoss features and those features are a duplicated entrypoint for installation
(i.e. each feature also exist somewhere else in the "features to install" tree
view). The ambigiouty is over such names as "Maven Support" and "Data
Services" in the context of the "all update site view" from the drop-down
filter at the top of the page.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: