[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi...
]
Alexey Kazakov commented on JBIDE-22619:
----------------------------------------
After further discussion with [~maxandersen], [~nickboldt], [~jeffmaury] we agreed to use
M1, M2, M3, etc suffixes instead of S114, S115 or Alpha1, Beta1 ets in fix versions in
JIRA, pom.xml's, etc.
Decide strategy for fixversion targets in JIRA
----------------------------------------------
Key: JBIDE-22619
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22619
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Task
Components: build
Affects Versions: 4.4.1.S116
Reporter: Nick Boldt
Assignee: Alexey Kazakov
Fix For: 4.4.1.S116
We need to decide the strategy for milestones / fixversions in JIRA.
One suggestion has been to align fixversions w/ sprint numbers, thus:
* 4.4.1.S116, 4.4.1.S117, 4.4.1.S118, 4.4.1.S119, ...?
instead of
* 4.4.1.Alpha1, 4.4.1.Alpha2, 4.4.1.Alpha3, 4.4.1.Beta1, ... ?
Questions/concerns:
* what do we do for unscheduled milestones (4.5.0.Alpha1, 11.0.0.Alpha1) and placeholders
(4.4.1.Final, 10.0.1.GA) ? Should we just use Alpha1 or Final/GA until we know which
sprint applies?
* whatever schema we adopt has to work with bzira and jiralint
* any other systems that parse JIRA for integration purposes?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)