[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi...
]
Mickael Istria commented on JBIDE-11524:
----------------------------------------
Why is it confusing now, when it's been perfectly acceptable for
the whole of the JBDS 4 cycle and now nearly all of the JBDS 5 cycle too?
I think that's my fault ;) I'm a kind of "naming integrist", so I'm
the one to blame for this debate. But if nightly is confusing for me, and staging is
confusing for Max, then it means these words are confusing to other people too and create
some lack of understanding to them.
So this debate is useful.
Would it make sense to change this for the JBDS 6 cycle, but leave
things as is for 4.x and 5.x?
the priority of this ticket is marked as minor. I agree on its a low-priority. Although we
won't change it now, it is good to gather opinions and make a decision for these names
ASAP.
Finding good names is currently a background task.
Rename jobs, sites, profiles, variables... to clearer names (remove
reference to nightly)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBIDE-11524
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11524
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: Build/Releng
Reporter: Mickael Istria
Assignee: Nick Boldt
Priority: Minor
nightly is a very confusing name, that does not reflect at all what really happens.
We should prefer using "staging" in variable, profiles, jobs, url... to make it
clearer
For instance,
* jbosstools-nightly-staging-composite -> jbosstools-staging-composite
* jboostools-nightly -> jbosstools-staging-aggregate
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira