]
Mickael Istria commented on JBIDE-22619:
----------------------------------------
We already have a dedicated field on Jira to track sprint number so I don't see the
advantage of repeating it in fixVersion.
Also, the fixVersion is a "user-friendly" presentation of when this is going to
be available. I'm not sure it's better to tell our user "next sprint"
than to tell "next Beta" as we do not publish proper binaries to users by the
end of a sprint.
IMO, we're better keeping our current rules.
Decide strategy for fixversion targets in JIRA
----------------------------------------------
Key: JBIDE-22619
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22619
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Task
Components: build
Affects Versions: 4.4.1.S116
Reporter: Nick Boldt
Assignee: Alexey Kazakov
Fix For: 4.4.1.S116
We need to decide the strategy for milestones / fixversions in JIRA.
One suggestion has been to align fixversions w/ sprint numbers, thus:
* 4.4.1.S116, 4.4.1.S117, 4.4.1.S118, 4.4.1.S119, ...?
instead of
* 4.4.1.Alpha1, 4.4.1.Alpha2, 4.4.1.Alpha3, 4.4.1.Beta1, ... ?
Questions/concerns:
* what do we do for unscheduled milestones (4.5.0.Alpha1, 11.0.0.Alpha1) and placeholders
(4.4.1.Final, 10.0.1.GA) ? Should we just use Alpha1 or Final/GA until we know which
sprint applies?
* whatever schema we adopt has to work with bzira and jiralint
* any other systems that parse JIRA for integration purposes?