[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-2112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on JBDS-2112:
-----------------------------------------------
JBoss JIRA Server <jira-update(a)redhat.com> made a comment on [bug
811981|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811981]
Nick Boldt <nboldt(a)redhat.com> made a comment on jira JBDS-2046
Remember, there are TWO Central Discovery Plugins: one for JBT and a second for JBDS.
There are also TWO update sites behind those discovery plugins: JBT SOA (with things like
SwitchYard) and JBDS SOA (without incubating projects).
So... @Len, I'm assuming your comments refer only to the JBDS Central and JBDS SOA
Tooling Update Site, not the JBT ones.
Max, meanwhile, seems adamant that we NOT use product branding in JBT or JBDS, and that we
use the same categories in both JBT and JBDS... so we'll need a different approach
there, eg., that we use "Business Rules" instead of BRMS.
And what of the jbpm5 question?
should jbpm5 be included in both SOA and Business Rules connectors /
categories?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBDS-2112
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-2112
Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio)
Issue Type: Sub-task
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: SOA Tooling / Platform
Affects Versions: 5.0.0.Beta1-SOA
Reporter: Nick Boldt
Assignee: John Graham
Currently:
"SOA-P Tooling" category includes jbpm3
"BRMS Tooling" category includes jbpm5
!https://issues.jboss.org/secure/attachment/12353481/12353481_jbds-central-soa-new-approach-000.png!
Should jbpm5 be in BOTH categories / connectors?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira