[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-2112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Nick Boldt updated JBDS-2112:
-----------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: JBoss JIRA Server <jira-update(a)redhat.com> made a comment on [bug
811977|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811977]
Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen(a)redhat.com> made a comment on jira JBDS-2046
Len - BRMS is a product name - so no, that is not what it would be.
"Business Rules" was my suggestion for general category name for it.
Nick, and yes there are two one for JBT and JBDS and the suggestion is we use the same
category names to avoid having confusion.
About jbpm5 I think this issue has outgrown its ability to handle actual content
questions. Open a new for that and ask Doug to work on that ?)
should jbpm5 be included in both SOA and Business Rules connectors /
categories?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBDS-2112
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-2112
Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio)
Issue Type: Sub-task
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: SOA Tooling / Platform
Affects Versions: 5.0.0.Beta1-SOA
Reporter: Nick Boldt
Assignee: John Graham
Currently:
"SOA-P Tooling" category includes jbpm3
"BRMS Tooling" category includes jbpm5
!https://issues.jboss.org/secure/attachment/12353481/12353481_jbds-central-soa-new-approach-000.png!
Should jbpm5 be in BOTH categories / connectors?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira