[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Nick Boldt commented on JBDS-3163: ---------------------------------- Did you mean updates/9.0/staging/, updates/9.0/development/, and updates/9.0/stable/ ? [~maxandersen] doesn't like the word "releases". Otherwise, the above makes sense, with ONE problem: The builds/ folder today includes the installers - both the standalone and the *EAP bundles*. Maybe we need to make sure those are .htaccess-restricted? [~burrsutter] [~maxandersen] [~pmuir] Do you care if we put pre-GA JDBS 9 installers, bundled with EAP, on the public-facing devstudio.redhat.com, or do they need to stay on a non-public server until ready for GA and exposed via CDN/GoldenGate/CSP? Making them public makes it easier for QE & CAT to test pre-GA stuff; also makes it easier for people w/o VPN to test. But it risks getting EAP into the hands of people who haven't signed up for the jboss.org Ts&Cs. Is that a problem? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.8#6338)