[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-17919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Andre Dietisheim edited comment on JBIDE-17919 at 8/4/14 9:29 AM: ------------------------------------------------------------------ [~jcantrill] the basic design intended to always set the filename for the user, not allowing a user to pick a name freely. This made the whole UI a lot easier in terms of validation (and since we're in a hurry mostly...). The filename that is constructed also should always use the type of the snapshot and some numerical snapshot if there's already a file with the filepattern that we use: *<application>-<snapshot-type><numerical suffix if required>.tar.gz I did not reproduce the bug but as far as I understand the problem is solely in the <snapshot-type> not being switched correctly in some situations? To me our approach has some benefits compared to rhc. Blindly overwriting is never a good option imho. I thus dont think that we should care about consistency with a inferior approach? was (Author: adietish): [~jcantrill] the basic design intended to always set the filename for the user, not allowing a user to pick a name freely. This made the whole UI a lot easier in terms of validation (and since we're in a hurry mostly...). The filename that is constructed also should always use the type of the snapshot and some numerical snapshot if there's already a file with the filepattern that we use: *<application>-<snapshot-type><numerical suffix if required>.tar.gz I did not reproduce the bug but as far as I understand the problem is solely in the <snapshot-type> not being switched correctly in some situations? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.6#6264)