[
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-6686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Jiri Peterka closed JBIDE-6686.
-------------------------------
Assignee: Jiri Peterka (was: Dmitry Geraskov)
Verified in JBDS 4.0.0.v201008232021N-H413-M2, Linux 64, JDK 1.6. Currently JPA Facets is
set correctly and Hibernate Platform JPA version is based on previous page JPA
Configuration setting.
Hibernate platform names for JPA Facet are misleading/incorrect
---------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBIDE-6686
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-6686
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Hibernate
Affects Versions: 3.2.0.M1
Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen
Assignee: Jiri Peterka
Fix For: 3.2.0.M2
We seem to provide two platform names under JPA Facet:
"Hibernate" & "Hibernate jpa 2.0"
1) Both shows up no matter if I choose JPA 1 or JPA 2 on the facet page, that does not
sound correct to me.
2) Why is "jpa" lower case ?
3) Why does one has a version and the on none ?
4) Shouldn't these be named after the main Hibernate version they target ? i.e.
Hibernate 3.3-3.4 and Hibernate 3.5 ?
Or simply Hibernate EntityManager 3.4, Hibernate EntityManager 3.5 ? (need to check the
version numbers if they are correct, since i'm just
speaking of memory here)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira