[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu... ] Snjezana Peco updated JBIDE-3979: --------------------------------- Attachment: before.png now.png -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu... ] Alexey Kazakov commented on JBIDE-3979: --------------------------------------- We changed the type to fix https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3336 We can't use Seam Problem type because WTP remove all markers which have a type belonged to particular Validator. For example we have EJB and WAR Seam projects. When we change some files in EJB then WTP starts two validation processes: - Incremental Seam validation of EJB for changed files. - Full Seam validation of WAR project (there are not any changes in WAR project but WTP start it because those projects are delpendent). First process remove all problem markers for changed resources in EJB. But when WTP starts second process for WAR project it removes ALL problem markers with Seam Problem type. But now our Seam Validator is smart enough not to re-validate all resources for WAR project in that case. So we use different problems types now to hide problem markers from WTP. And our validator removes problem markers when we really need it. Snjezana, what do you need here to have the quickfix feature worked well? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu... ] Snjezana Peco commented on JBIDE-3979: -------------------------------------- I can create this quickfix using the following condition: SeamProjectPropertyValidator.INVALID_RUNTIME.equals(marker.getAttribute("messageId","")) It would be good if we could change SeamProjectPropertyValidator.INVALID_RUNTIME from "INVALID_RUNTIME" to "INVALID_SEAM_RUNTIME". Alexey, Would changing this constant break anything? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu... ] Snjezana Peco resolved JBIDE-3979. ---------------------------------- Resolution: Done Committed to the trunk and jbosstools-3.0.x branch. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira