[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-15610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi...
]
Max Rydahl Andersen commented on JBIDE-15610:
---------------------------------------------
[~nickboldt] no, I sayed that if the forge runtime plugin still is version 1.2.0 between
two releases using 1.2.0a to avoid the version number to drift too much could be an
option.
For 4.1.1.Beta1: since one forge plugin has bumped, so should they
all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBIDE-15610
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-15610
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: forge
Affects Versions: 4.1.1.Alpha2
Reporter: Nick Boldt
Assignee: Koen Aers
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 4.1.1.Beta1
[~maxandersen] would prefer that since a single forge plugin (forge.runtime) has bumped
from 1.3.3 to 1.4.1, that all the forge plugins (and their containing features) also bump
at least their service (micro) increment.
Thus:
1.2.0 -> 1.2.1
1.0.0 -> 1.0.1
2.0.0 -> 2.0.1
And in master branch [1], I'm guessing this is wrong:
{code}org.jboss.tools.forge2.runtime_2.0.1.Alpha1-v20130927-1755-B403.jar{code}
Shouldn't that be at version 2.1.0 or 2.0.100, not 2.0.1?
[1]
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/builds/staging/jbosstools-forge_mast...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira