[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Pete Muir commented on JBDS-3162:
---------------------------------
{quote}As I've already said, it would seem very strange to have JBoss EAP, JBoss EWP,
JBoss AS, JBoss JPP, and JBoss Fuse Service Works. It would be more reasonable to lobby
that FSW simply become an approved abbreviation.{quote}
Of these, correct ones are:
* JBoss EAP
* JBoss AS
are correct.
* JBoss EWP should be JBoss Web Server
* JBoss JPP should be JBoss Portal
Note also that the customer portal article that [~mmusaji] linked is wrong, JBoss FSW is
not approved name for the JBoss Fuse Service Works product.
The product code can be used in urls, file name, directory names etc. but shouldn't be
used in UIs when describing a product. Unfortunately there is not much that can be done
here for the existing names, they need to be the approved abbreviation. I would suggest we
work work the BU to ensure that a rule is put in place for the max length of the approved
abbreviations.
Change "jboss-eap" to "JBoss Enterprise Application
Platform"
-------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBDS-3162
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3162
Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio)
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: runtime-detection, server, ui/branding
Reporter: Burr Sutter
Assignee: Rob Stryker
Labels: f2f2014
Fix For: 9.0.0.Alpha2
Attachments: JBDS-3162.suggested.png, JBDS-3162.suggested2.png
When installing JBDS+EAP (same installer), the default name under the Servers tab is
"jboss-eap". This is a request to have that default server name changed to
"JBoss Enterprise Application Platform".
And the default runtime name to "JBoss EAP Runtime".
http://www.screencast.com/t/POpKcyHjhtlP
http://www.screencast.com/t/LZdFW0rJu0
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.11#6341)