[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Pete Muir commented on JBDS-3162: --------------------------------- {quote}As I've already said, it would seem very strange to have JBoss EAP, JBoss EWP, JBoss AS, JBoss JPP, and JBoss Fuse Service Works. It would be more reasonable to lobby that FSW simply become an approved abbreviation.{quote} Of these, correct ones are: * JBoss EAP * JBoss AS are correct. * JBoss EWP should be JBoss Web Server * JBoss JPP should be JBoss Portal Note also that the customer portal article that [~mmusaji] linked is wrong, JBoss FSW is not approved name for the JBoss Fuse Service Works product. The product code can be used in urls, file name, directory names etc. but shouldn't be used in UIs when describing a product. Unfortunately there is not much that can be done here for the existing names, they need to be the approved abbreviation. I would suggest we work work the BU to ensure that a rule is put in place for the max length of the approved abbreviations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.11#6341)