[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Nick Boldt updated JBIDE-9726:
------------------------------
Description:
When installing from the M3 site:
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/development/indigo/soa-tooling/
I notice that most features in JBoss Tools have a license from Red Hat which mentions EPL,
GPL, and other licenses. It's a catch-all which allows a cleaner view of what's
being installed, all under the same umbrella.
!inconsistent-license-details.png!
The following features should adopt this statement in their features so that we're
consistent across the board:
Savara (GPL)
Drools (ASL)
pi4soa (ASL)
Teiid (EPL)
Text is as follows (copied from cdi.feature/feature.properties):
{code}
license=Red Hat, Inc. licenses these features and plugins to you under \
certain open source licenses (or aggregations of such licenses), which \
in a particular case may include the Eclipse Public License, the GNU \
Lesser General Public License, and/or certain other open source \
licenses. For precise licensing details, consult the corresponding \
source code, or contact Red Hat Legal Affairs, 1801 Varsity Drive, \
Raleigh NC 27606 USA.
{code}
was:
Most features in JBoss Tools have a license from Red Hat which mentions EPL, GPL, and
other licenses. It's a catch-all which allows a cleaner view of what's being
installed.
!inconsistent-license-details.png!
The following features should adopt this statement in their features so that we're
consistent across the board:
Savara (GPL)
Drools (ASL)
pi4soa (ASL)
Teiid (EPL)
Text is as follows (copied from cdi.feature/feature.properties):
{code}
license=Red Hat, Inc. licenses these features and plugins to you under \
certain open source licenses (or aggregations of such licenses), which \
in a particular case may include the Eclipse Public License, the GNU \
Lesser General Public License, and/or certain other open source \
licenses. For precise licensing details, consult the corresponding \
source code, or contact Red Hat Legal Affairs, 1801 Varsity Drive, \
Raleigh NC 27606 USA.
{code}
inconsistent licensing terms across JBoss Tools - SOA Tooling site
------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBIDE-9726
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9726
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: drools, pi4soa, Savara, teiid, updatesite
Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M3
Reporter: Nick Boldt
Assignee: Brian Fitzpatrick
Fix For: 3.3.0.M4
Attachments: inconsistent-license-details.png
When installing from the M3 site:
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/development/indigo/soa-tooling/
I notice that most features in JBoss Tools have a license from Red Hat which mentions
EPL, GPL, and other licenses. It's a catch-all which allows a cleaner view of
what's being installed, all under the same umbrella.
!inconsistent-license-details.png!
The following features should adopt this statement in their features so that we're
consistent across the board:
Savara (GPL)
Drools (ASL)
pi4soa (ASL)
Teiid (EPL)
Text is as follows (copied from cdi.feature/feature.properties):
{code}
license=Red Hat, Inc. licenses these features and plugins to you under \
certain open source licenses (or aggregations of such licenses), which \
in a particular case may include the Eclipse Public License, the GNU \
Lesser General Public License, and/or certain other open source \
licenses. For precise licensing details, consult the corresponding \
source code, or contact Red Hat Legal Affairs, 1801 Varsity Drive, \
Raleigh NC 27606 USA.
{code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira