[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-16056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Max Rydahl Andersen commented on JBIDE-16056: --------------------------------------------- [~snjeza], see the comment above: Yes, please put in the PR. Below is me requesting to create jira to find ways we can either remove/lock down this portal integration or find a way so changes in the runtimes doesn't always break us: "But we should create a jira to start winding this feature down and not have to keep maintaining it because there is simple too many moving factors here and removing files in a facet without warnings is just a really bad thing to start doing." And then I ask if you have checked the latest WFK seam libraries are also incompatible and if they are that should be investigated since it does not make sense that we got incompatible conflicting richfaces libraries in these two frameworks: "Also are you sure the richfaces libraries are not compatible if you use the latest versions from WFK/Seam ? We really should reach out to wfk/richfaces team before doing such changes in tools if it is actually already handled on the runtime side....and if it is nothandled there that incompatbility sounds like a bug we should get reported." So in short - yes, apply this PR and then open jiras and reach out to seam/wfk team for the remaining issues. But that can be done next week. PR is the important part now. But probably too late if [~nickboldt] already started the respin. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira