]
Jeff MAURY commented on JBDS-4362:
----------------------------------
+1 for 11 target. Regarding the OSS nature of the stuff, my understanding is that some of
the image (used in the installer or in DevStudio) are not OSS, that's why some repos
in the jbdevstudio GitHub organisation are private
Consider eliminating the devstudio EAP installer bundle?
--------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBDS-4362
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-4362
Project: Red Hat JBoss Developer Studio (devstudio)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: installer, integration-platform
Affects Versions: 10.4.0.AM3
Reporter: Nick Boldt
Assignee: Nick Boldt
Fix For: 11.0.0.AM1
For devstudio 11, we might want to eliminate the devstudio EAP installer.
If we could do so, we would no longer require an internal-facing server (eg.,
www.qa or
wonka.mw) since everything in devstudio would be completely open source and free.
This would also make releases simpler and faster as I wouldn't have to push bits to
BOTH the internal and external staging servers - we could stage 100% on the public
devstudio.redhat.com server.
Since EAP releases don't align very well with devstudio releases, maybe it's time
to decouple entirely?
That way only the devSUITE installer would include EAP.