[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Max Rydahl Andersen commented on JBDS-3495:
-------------------------------------------
I don't follow. If the user already installed from the nightly site - why would he
want the nightly updatesite added ?
And why would you want linuxtools updatesite added if you are installing from jbosstools
or anyone elses updatesite ?
This is really counter intuitive.
If you insist on having this, can you tell me which updatesite we can use for building
that does not have this force add of an updatesite ?
Today we remove any references to external updatesites to be sure check for updates
don't come with "surprises" unless the users actually explicitly wanted it.
But we don't do that for p2.inf since p2.inf often contains *other* content (like
rewiring of IU's etc.) that are actually possible to share.
But these install actions aren't good imo.
JBDS 9.0.0.beta is preconfigured with an Eclipse Docker tooling site
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBDS-3495
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3495
Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: updatesite
Affects Versions: 9.0.0.Beta2
Reporter: Len DiMaggio
Assignee: Xavier Coulon
Fix For: 9.0.0.CR1
Attachments: DockerTooling.png
See attached screenshot - JBDS 9.0.0.beta2 is preconfigured with this update site:
http://download.eclipse.org/linuxtools/updates-docker-nightly
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)