[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-2669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Nick Boldt commented on JBDS-2669: ---------------------------------- If we're taking the time to refactor, I'd like to see us move to *com.jboss.devstudio* or *com.redhat.jbdevstudio*, rather than keeping com.jboss.jbds since it's inconsistent w/ other namespaces used to refer to devstudio/jbdevstudio. So, +1 for Option D (if everyone likes the somewhat unneeded ".core." segment), _once we decide on which namespace to use_. [~maxandersen] with your new powers of better email management, which would you rather see? Option D1: As above but using *com.jboss.devstudio.core* instead of com.jboss.jbds namespace Option D2: As above but using *com.redhat.jbdevstudio.core* instead of com.jboss.jbds namespace Option D3: As above but using *com.jboss.devstudio* instead of com.jboss.jbds namespace (drop the .core segment) Option D4: As above but using *com.redhat.jbdevstudio* instead of com.jboss.jbds namespace (drop the .core segment) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira