[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-2669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Nick Boldt edited comment on JBDS-2669 at 1/6/14 10:56 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
+1 to Mickael's idea. Also like Denis' idea of switching to com.redhat.jbdevstudio
instead of com.jboss.devstudio, but not sure if we're allowed to use a com.redhat
namespace.
So we would therefore have something like this:
*Option A*
{quote}
com.jboss.jbds.product => *com.jboss.devstudio.product.plugin*
com.jboss.jbds.product.feature => *com.jboss.devstudio.core.feature*
com.jboss.jbds.all and com.jboss.jbds.product.product =>
*com.jboss.devstudio.product.package*
{quote}
*Option B*
{quote}
com.jboss.jbds.product => *com.redhat.jbdevstudio.product.plugin*
com.jboss.jbds.product.feature => *com.redhat.jbdevstudio.core.feature*
com.jboss.jbds.all and com.jboss.jbds.product.product =>
*com.redhat.jbdevstudio.product.package*
{quote}
Perhaps simpler would be to drop "core" and "product" in favour of
just using "plugin", "feature", and "package", like this?
*Option C*
{quote}
com.jboss.jbds.product => *com.redhat.jbdevstudio.plugin*
com.jboss.jbds.product.feature => *com.redhat.jbdevstudio.feature*
com.jboss.jbds.all and com.jboss.jbds.product.product =>
*com.redhat.jbdevstudio.package*
{quote}
[~maxandersen] [~dgolovin] [~mickael_istria] WDYT?
was (Author: nickboldt):
+1 to Mickael's idea. So we would therefore have one of these two:
*Option A*
{quote}
com.jboss.jbds.product => *com.jboss.devstudio.product.plugin*
com.jboss.jbds.product.feature => *com.jboss.devstudio.core.feature*
com.jboss.jbds.all and com.jboss.jbds.product.product =>
*com.jboss.devstudio.product.package*
{quote}
*Option B*
{quote}
com.jboss.jbds.product => *com.redhat.jbdevstudio.product.plugin*
com.jboss.jbds.product.feature => *com.redhat.jbdevstudio.core.feature*
com.jboss.jbds.all and com.jboss.jbds.product.product =>
*com.redhat.jbdevstudio.product.package*
{quote}
Perhaps simpler would be to drop "core" and "product" in favour of
just using "plugin", "feature", and "package", like this?
*Option C*
{quote}
com.jboss.jbds.product => *com.redhat.jbdevstudio.plugin*
com.jboss.jbds.product.feature => *com.redhat.jbdevstudio.feature*
com.jboss.jbds.all and com.jboss.jbds.product.product =>
*com.redhat.jbdevstudio.package*
{quote}
rename/refactor JBDS product .feature / plugin / .product to have
less confusing names
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBDS-2669
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-2669
Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio)
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: build, installer, updatesite
Affects Versions: 7.0.0.GA
Reporter: Nick Boldt
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 8.0.0.Alpha2
We should consider some better names for these artifacts so they collide less and are
more obvious which is which.
1.
https://github.com/jbdevstudio/jbdevstudio-product/blob/master/features/c...
** featureName=JBoss Developer Studio (Core Features) / BYOE category in update site
2.
https://github.com/jbdevstudio/jbdevstudio-product/blob/master/plugins/co...
and
https://github.com/jbdevstudio/jbdevstudio-product/blob/master/plugins/co...
** Bundle-SymbolicName: com.jboss.jbds.product;singleton:=true
3.
https://github.com/jbdevstudio/jbdevstudio-product/blob/master/site/com.j...
** name="JBoss Developer Studio (Branded Product)"
uid="com.jboss.jbds.all" id="com.jboss.jbds.product.product"
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira