[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBIDE-9676)...

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBIDE-9193)...

Brian Fitzpatrick (JIRA)

Tuesday, 21 June 2011 Tue, 21 Jun '11

2:01 p.m.

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: bpel, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M2 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Show replies by date

Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)

Wednesday, 22 June Wed, 22 Jun

6:17 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Max Rydahl Andersen updated JBIDE-9219: --------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.3.0.M3 (was: 3.3.0.M2)

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: bpel, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M3 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)

6:17 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Max Rydahl Andersen commented on JBIDE-9219: -------------------------------------------- not blocking M2

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: bpel, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M3 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

Monday, 22 August Mon, 22 Aug

1:24 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 8/22/11 2:23 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... Plus this jobs which are currently disabled pending code freeze for M3: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... Currently, blocked by these test failures: {code} [INFO] org.jboss.tools.smooks.ui.bot.test ................ FAILURE [1.645s] (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9460) [INFO] org.jboss.tools.esb.validator.test ................ FAILURE [55.800s] [INFO] org.jboss.tools.jbpm.ui.bot.test .................. FAILURE [0.742s] (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9469) {code} was (Author: nickboldt): Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... Plus this jobs which are currently disabled pending code freeze for M3: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... Currently, blocked by these test failures: {code} [INFO] org.jboss.tools.smooks.ui.bot.test ................ FAILURE [1.645s] (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9460) [INFO] org.jboss.tools.esb.validator.test ................ FAILURE [55.800s] [INFO] org.jboss.tools.jbpm.ui.bot.test .................. FAILURE [0.742s] {code}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: bpel, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M3 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

Wednesday, 24 August Wed, 24 Aug

12:11 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 8/24/11 1:09 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... Plus this jobs which are currently disabled pending code freeze for M3: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... Currently, blocked by these test failures: {code} [INFO] org.jboss.tools.smooks.ui.bot.test ................ FAILURE [1.645s] - JBIDE-9460 [INFO] org.jboss.tools.esb.validator.test ................ FAILURE [55.80s] - JBIDE-9582 [INFO] org.jboss.tools.jbpm.ui.bot.test .................. FAILURE [0.742s] - JBIDE-9469 {code} was (Author: nickboldt): Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... Plus this jobs which are currently disabled pending code freeze for M3: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... Currently, blocked by these test failures: {code} [INFO] org.jboss.tools.smooks.ui.bot.test ................ FAILURE [1.645s] (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9460) [INFO] org.jboss.tools.esb.validator.test ................ FAILURE [55.800s] [INFO] org.jboss.tools.jbpm.ui.bot.test .................. FAILURE [0.742s] (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9469) {code}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: bpel, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M3 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

12:11 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 8/24/11 1:10 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... Plus this jobs which are currently disabled pending code freeze for M3: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... Currently, blocked by these test failures: org.jboss.tools.smooks.ui.bot.test - JBIDE-9460 org.jboss.tools.esb.validator.test - JBIDE-9582 org.jboss.tools.jbpm.ui.bot.test - JBIDE-9469 was (Author: nickboldt): Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... Plus this jobs which are currently disabled pending code freeze for M3: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... Currently, blocked by these test failures: {code} [INFO] org.jboss.tools.smooks.ui.bot.test ................ FAILURE [1.645s] - JBIDE-9460 [INFO] org.jboss.tools.esb.validator.test ................ FAILURE [55.80s] - JBIDE-9582 [INFO] org.jboss.tools.jbpm.ui.bot.test .................. FAILURE [0.742s] - JBIDE-9469 {code}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: bpel, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M3 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)

Wednesday, 31 August Wed, 31 Aug

3:54 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Max Rydahl Andersen commented on JBIDE-9219: -------------------------------------------- why do this as separate and renamed pom.xml's ? Shouldn't this be separate things(different location) or just ap rofile ?

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: bpel, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M3 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

12:33 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt commented on JBIDE-9219: ----------------------------------- Yeah, I guess a profile would work too. This just seemed easier to maintain. (?)

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: bpel, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M3 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

1:09 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt updated JBIDE-9219: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.3.0.M4 (was: 3.3.0.M3) Bump to M4 due to upstream.

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: bpel, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

Thursday, 1 September Thu, 1 Sep

11:21 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt updated JBIDE-9219: ------------------------------ Fix Version/s: (was: 3.3.0.M3)

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

11:21 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M3, 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

11:23 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

Friday, 2 September Fri, 2 Sep

3:55 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt updated JBIDE-9219: ------------------------------ Comment: was deleted (was: Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... Plus this jobs which are currently disabled pending code freeze for M3: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... Currently, blocked by these test failures: org.jboss.tools.smooks.ui.bot.test - JBIDE-9460 org.jboss.tools.esb.validator.test - JBIDE-9582 org.jboss.tools.jbpm.ui.bot.test - JBIDE-9469 )

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

3:55 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt commented on JBIDE-9219: ----------------------------------- Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ -- {color:red}STALLED > 14hrs{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ -- {color:green}3,284 tests (+11), no failures; Emma: Coverage: Classes 2785/5148 (54%). Methods 13562/35655 (38%). Blocks 321744/879724 (37%). Lines 75115.8/204888 (37%){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... -- {color:orange}project org.jbpm.gd.jpdl: Unqualified OSGi version 3.4.1.qualifier must match unqualified Maven version 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT for SNAPSHOT builds{color} {quote} Plus these jobs for M3: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ -- {color:green}3,173 tests; 2 failures{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:orange}incorrect job config; respinning{color} {quote}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

5:38 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/2/11 6:36 PM: ----------------------------------------------------------- Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ -- {color:red}STALLED > 14hrs{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ -- {color:green}3,284 tests (+11), no failures; Emma: Coverage: Classes 2785/5148 (54%). Methods 13562/35655 (38%). Blocks 321744/879724 (37%). Lines 75115.8/204888 (37%){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... -- {color:orange}project org.jbpm.gd.jpdl: Unqualified OSGi version 3.4.1.qualifier must match unqualified Maven version 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT for SNAPSHOT builds{color} {quote} Plus these jobs for M3: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ -- {color:green}3,173 tests; 2 failures{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:green}501 tests, 0 failures{color} {quote} was (Author: nickboldt): Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ -- {color:red}STALLED > 14hrs{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ -- {color:green}3,284 tests (+11), no failures; Emma: Coverage: Classes 2785/5148 (54%). Methods 13562/35655 (38%). Blocks 321744/879724 (37%). Lines 75115.8/204888 (37%){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... -- {color:orange}project org.jbpm.gd.jpdl: Unqualified OSGi version 3.4.1.qualifier must match unqualified Maven version 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT for SNAPSHOT builds{color} {quote} Plus these jobs for M3: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ -- {color:green}3,173 tests; 2 failures{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:orange}incorrect job config; respinning{color} {quote}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

5:38 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/2/11 6:37 PM: ----------------------------------------------------------- Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ -- {color:red}STALLED > 14hrs{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ -- {color:green}3,284 tests (+11), no failures; Emma: Coverage: Classes 2785/5148 (54%). Methods 13562/35655 (38%). Blocks 321744/879724 (37%). Lines 75115.8/204888 (37%){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... -- {color:orange}project org.jbpm.gd.jpdl: 3.4.1.qualifier != 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT :: RESPINNING{color} {quote} Plus these jobs for M3: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ -- {color:green}3,173 tests; 2 failures{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:green}501 tests, 0 failures{color} {quote} was (Author: nickboldt): Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ -- {color:red}STALLED > 14hrs{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ -- {color:green}3,284 tests (+11), no failures; Emma: Coverage: Classes 2785/5148 (54%). Methods 13562/35655 (38%). Blocks 321744/879724 (37%). Lines 75115.8/204888 (37%){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... -- {color:orange}project org.jbpm.gd.jpdl: Unqualified OSGi version 3.4.1.qualifier must match unqualified Maven version 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT for SNAPSHOT builds{color} {quote} Plus these jobs for M3: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ -- {color:green}3,173 tests; 2 failures{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:green}501 tests, 0 failures{color} {quote}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

Saturday, 3 September Sat, 3 Sep

1:21 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/3/11 2:19 AM: ----------------------------------------------------------- Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ -- {color:red}STALLED > 14hrs{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ -- {color:green}3,284 tests (+11), no failures; Emma: Coverage: Classes 2785/5148 (54%). Methods 13562/35655 (38%). Blocks 321744/879724 (37%). Lines 75115.8/204888 (37%){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} {quote} Plus these jobs for M3: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ -- {color:green}3,173 tests; 2 failures{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:green}501 tests, 0 failures{color} {quote} was (Author: nickboldt): Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ -- {color:red}STALLED > 14hrs{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ -- {color:green}3,284 tests (+11), no failures; Emma: Coverage: Classes 2785/5148 (54%). Methods 13562/35655 (38%). Blocks 321744/879724 (37%). Lines 75115.8/204888 (37%){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... -- {color:orange}project org.jbpm.gd.jpdl: 3.4.1.qualifier != 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT :: RESPINNING{color} {quote} Plus these jobs for M3: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ -- {color:green}3,173 tests; 2 failures{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:green}501 tests, 0 failures{color} {quote}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

1:25 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt commented on JBIDE-9219: ----------------------------------- Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss...

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

3:17 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/3/11 4:16 AM: ----------------------------------------------------------- Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... - jbpm compilation error https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... was (Author: nickboldt): Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss...

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

3:19 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/3/11 4:19 AM: ----------------------------------------------------------- Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... - jbpm compilation error https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - #16 had hudson misconfig; respinning #17 was (Author: nickboldt): Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... - jbpm compilation error https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss...

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

Sunday, 4 September Sun, 4 Sep

9:55 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/4/11 10:54 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange}- job config error; respinning{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - #16 had hudson misconfig; respinning #17 was (Author: nickboldt): Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... - jbpm compilation error https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - #16 had hudson misconfig; respinning #17

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

9:57 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/4/11 10:56 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange}- job config error; respinning{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color} was (Author: nickboldt): Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange}- job config error; respinning{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - #16 had hudson misconfig; respinning #17

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

9:59 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/4/11 10:57 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange}- job config error but maven build SUCCESS; respinning{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color} was (Author: nickboldt): Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange}- job config error; respinning{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

10:05 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/4/11 11:03 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... - NPE -- trying again w/ simpler job and !coverage to disable https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange}- job config error but maven build SUCCESS; respinning{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color} was (Author: nickboldt): Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange}- job config error but maven build SUCCESS; respinning{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

10:08 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/4/11 11:08 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange} - 141-150 NPE'd -- trying again w/ simpler job and !coverage to disable{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange}- job config error but maven build SUCCESS; respinning{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color} was (Author: nickboldt): Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... - NPE -- trying again w/ simpler job and !coverage to disable https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange}- job config error but maven build SUCCESS; respinning{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

11:40 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/5/11 12:40 AM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange} - 141-150 NPE'd -- trying again w/ simpler job and !coverage to disable{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:green}502 tests, no failures{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color} was (Author: nickboldt): Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange} - 141-150 NPE'd -- trying again w/ simpler job and !coverage to disable{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange}- job config error but maven build SUCCESS; respinning{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

11:42 p.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/5/11 12:40 AM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange} - 141-150 NPE'd -- trying again w/ simpler job and !coverage to disable - FAILED. NPE'd again :({color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:green}502 tests, no failures{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color} was (Author: nickboldt): Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange} - 141-150 NPE'd -- trying again w/ simpler job and !coverage to disable{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:green}502 tests, no failures{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

Monday, 5 September Mon, 5 Sep

1:17 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/5/11 2:17 AM: ----------------------------------------------------------- Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:red} - 141-150 NPE'd -- trying again w/ simpler job and !coverage to disable - FAILED. NPE'd again :({color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:red}NPE{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:green}502 tests, no failures{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color} was (Author: nickboldt): Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:orange} - 141-150 NPE'd -- trying again w/ simpler job and !coverage to disable - FAILED. NPE'd again :({color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - NPE https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:green}502 tests, no failures{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

1:19 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/5/11 2:17 AM: ----------------------------------------------------------- Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ -- {color:red}STALLED > 14hrs{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ -- {color:green}3,284 tests (+11), no failures; Emma: Coverage: Classes 2785/5148 (54%). Methods 13562/35655 (38%). Blocks 321744/879724 (37%). Lines 75115.8/204888 (37%){color} -https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.tests/ -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color}- {quote} Plus these jobs for M3: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ -- {color:green}3,173 tests; 2 failures{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:green}501 tests, 0 failures{color} {quote} was (Author: nickboldt): Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ -- {color:red}STALLED > 14hrs{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ -- {color:green}3,284 tests (+11), no failures; Emma: Coverage: Classes 2785/5148 (54%). Methods 13562/35655 (38%). Blocks 321744/879724 (37%). Lines 75115.8/204888 (37%){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} {quote} Plus these jobs for M3: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ -- {color:green}3,173 tests; 2 failures{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:green}501 tests, 0 failures{color} {quote}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

1:19 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/5/11 2:18 AM: ----------------------------------------------------------- Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ -- {color:red}STALLED > 14hrs{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ -- {color:green}3,284 tests (+11), no failures; Emma: Coverage: Classes 2785/5148 (54%). Methods 13562/35655 (38%). Blocks 321744/879724 (37%). Lines 75115.8/204888 (37%){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... -- {color:red}-java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222)-{color} {quote} Plus these jobs for M3: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ -- {color:green}3,173 tests; 2 failures{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:green}501 tests, 0 failures{color} {quote} was (Author: nickboldt): Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ -- {color:red}STALLED > 14hrs{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ -- {color:green}3,284 tests (+11), no failures; Emma: Coverage: Classes 2785/5148 (54%). Methods 13562/35655 (38%). Blocks 321744/879724 (37%). Lines 75115.8/204888 (37%){color} -https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.tests/ -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color}- {quote} Plus these jobs for M3: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ -- {color:green}3,173 tests; 2 failures{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:green}501 tests, 0 failures{color} {quote}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

Tuesday, 6 September Tue, 6 Sep

11:56 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/6/11 12:56 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ -- {color:red}STALLED > 14hrs{color} {color:green} - after removing the "outside Hudson static workspace" config, build is blue!{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} {color:green} - after removing the "outside Hudson static workspace" config, build is blue!{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ -- {color:green}3,284 tests (+11), no failures; Emma: Coverage: Classes 2785/5148 (54%). Methods 13562/35655 (38%). Blocks 321744/879724 (37%). Lines 75115.8/204888 (37%){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... -- {color:red}-java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222)-{color} {quote} Plus these jobs for M3: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ -- {color:green}3,173 tests; 2 failures{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:green}501 tests, 0 failures{color} {quote} was (Author: nickboldt): Have created 2 new root poms: pom-core.xml (23 components): vpe, jst, jsf, forge, seam cdi, jmx, archives, as, hibernate freemarker, struts, ws, portlet, examples birt, maven, deltacloud, gwt, common runtime, usage, xulrunner pom-soa-tooling.xml (12 components): esb, jst, common, tests, smooks, jbpm, flow, bpel, archives, jmx modeshape, usage New/edited trunk jobs are: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.continuous/ -- {color:red}STALLED > 14hrs{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.co... -- {color:red}java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.tests/ -- {color:green}3,284 tests (+11), no failures; Emma: Coverage: Classes 2785/5148 (54%). Methods 13562/35655 (38%). Blocks 321744/879724 (37%). Lines 75115.8/204888 (37%){color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_trunk.soa-tooling.t... -- {color:red}-java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222)-{color} {quote} Plus these jobs for M3: {quote} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.contin... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:red} java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.tycho.core.osgitools.EquinoxResolver.assertResolved(EquinoxResolver.java:222){color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.tests/ -- {color:green}3,173 tests; 2 failures{color} http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbosstools-3.3_stable_branch.soa-to... -- {color:green}501 tests, 0 failures{color} {quote}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

11:56 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/6/11 12:56 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:red} - 141-150 NPE'd -- trying again w/ simpler job and !coverage to disable - FAILED. NPE'd again :({color} {color:green} - after removing the "outside Hudson static workspace" config, build is blue!{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:red}NPE{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:green}502 tests, no failures{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color} was (Author: nickboldt): Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:red} - 141-150 NPE'd -- trying again w/ simpler job and !coverage to disable - FAILED. NPE'd again :({color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:red}NPE{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:green}502 tests, no failures{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

11:58 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt edited comment on JBIDE-9219 at 9/6/11 12:57 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:red} - 141-150 NPE'd -- trying again w/ simpler job and !coverage to disable - FAILED. NPE'd again :({color} {color:green} - after removing the "outside Hudson static workspace" config, build is blue!{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:red}NPE{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:green}502 tests, no failures{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color} was (Author: nickboldt): Tweaked job configs and am respinning to verify: https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:red} - 141-150 NPE'd -- trying again w/ simpler job and !coverage to disable - FAILED. NPE'd again :({color} {color:green} - after removing the "outside Hudson static workspace" config, build is blue!{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:red}NPE{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Trunk/job/jbosstools-3.... {color:green}502 tests, no failures{color} https://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio_Stable_Branch/job/jboss... - {color:green}501 tests, no failures{color}

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Nick Boldt (JIRA)

Wednesday, 7 September Wed, 7 Sep

11:21 a.m.

New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Resolved: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Nick Boldt resolved JBIDE-9219. ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.3.0.M3 Resolution: Done Fixed in branch and trunk by removing the static outside-Hudson workspace. That did save some time and disk, but was causing the jobs to fail. Boourns!

...

Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBIDE-9219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-9219 Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) Issue Type: Sub-task Components: BPEL, bpm, drools, esb, jbpm, modeshape, pi4soa, Savara, smooks, teiid Affects Versions: 3.3.0.M1 Reporter: Brian Fitzpatrick Assignee: Nick Boldt Fix For: 3.3.0.M3, 3.3.0.M4 This arose in an e-mail from Nick: "Should we be splitting the cont's and test builds apart so they don't include the SOA components in the Core builds? Realize that I split up the aggregate + JBDS update site builds, but not the all-in-one tests job or the "does everything compile?" jobs." I think the answer is "yes" we need to do these things. The upside is that it should speed up the component builds on both sides of the equation. The downside is that it means more work for Nick and/or Doug.

-- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

5324

days inactive

5402

days old

jbosstools-issues@lists.jboss.org

Manage subscription

33 comments

3 participants

tags (0)

participants (3)

Brian Fitzpatrick (JIRA)
Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)
Nick Boldt (JIRA)

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBIDE-9219) Split up continuous and test builds for SOA/JBDS split