[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-25118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi...
]
Mat Booth commented on JBIDE-25118:
-----------------------------------
* Desktop file sanity: Always waive
* Elflint/Binary stripping: Usually it's because there is some unstripped or oddly
built native binary in a test suite that's used to test IDE debugging functions, but
seeing this error in any other case indicates a packaging error that should be fixed. I
would probably leave these for manual inspection.
* RPM requires/provides: Maybe leave these for manual inspection -- they usually happen
due to changes in a package in response to a bug, I'm not sure how you'd
programmatically give a sensible reason for the waiver.
* Shell syntax: This specific case is always a false positive that could always be waived
-- IMO it's probably a bug in rpmdiff mistaking tcl scripts for shell scripts.
* Execshield: This may only be waived by the security response team, so may as well
ignore it
An extra one:
* RPM changelog:
https://errata.devel.redhat.com/rpmdiff/show/182461?result_id=5039897 --
Alway waive with the reason I gave there "This change is ok because package was
resynchronised with the Fedora upstream" -- it turned out to be a non-trivial
exercise to merge upstream and downstream changelogs without violating some arbitrary
constraint that RPM imposes about changelog entry ordering, so when importing from Fedora,
the changelog is simply overwritten. I don't think anyone cares because all history is
still in git anyway.
improve errata waiver check script - add waivers for
desktop-file-sanity, patches, IP v6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBIDE-25118
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-25118
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: build, rpm
Reporter: Nick Boldt
Assignee: Nick Boldt
Labels: release
Fix For: 4.5.1.Final
{quote}
It sounds like we could add these check types to my script:
* desktop-file-sanity (always waive?)
* IP v6 (always waive using existing waiver details, eg.,
https://errata.devel.redhat.com/rpmdiff/show/182126?result_id=5028358
Yep, yep.
* patches (waive if %autopatch)
And if the only other complaints are "patch not applied" (I'm not sure if
this check may throw different kinds of error){quote}
So, the next time we have an errata with the above types of issues, I can update this
script [1] to add those use cases.
[1]
https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build-ci/blob/master/util/errata...
cc: [~mat.booth]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)