December 2007 - jbossws-dev - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Proxy Thread Safety

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

"thomas.diesler(a)jboss.com" wrote : A client proxy is inherently not thread safe. Making a remote call can be multiple step process i.e. setting binding properties first. Hi, and if I share binding properties for each invocation, it should be thread safe or not (again from method invocation point of view)? Richard View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4110122#4110122 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4110122

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Proxy Thread Safety

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

Hi Thomas, my mistake. Yes, you're right, SunRI proxy isn't thread safe as well Richard View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4110120#4110120 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4110120

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Proxy Thread Safety

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

The post sais anonymous wrote : | 4. What about each stub/port object? Is it thread-safe? (Iâm | guessing no.) | | Yes | Which I read as that the SunRI proxy is not thread safe either View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4110113#4110113 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4110113

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Proxy Thread Safety

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

According to http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=705659&messageID=4089586 it should be thread safe (from method invocation point of view) Richard View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4110110#4110110 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4110110

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Proxy Thread Safety

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

A client proxy is inherently not thread safe. Making a remote call can be multiple step process i.e. setting binding properties first The service is however thread safe and can be reused among multiple threads. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4110109#4110109 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4110109

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Proxy Thread Safety

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

Hi again, I'd like to extend my question to BindingProvider.getXYZContext() methods as well. Should these methods be thread safe too? For example CXF makes it thread safe, see: http://www.mail-archive.com/cxf-user@incubator.apache.org/msg00150.html Richard View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4110106#4110106 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4110106

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Proxy Thread Safety

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

Hi Team, I'm using endpoint proxy created using methods Service.getPort(..., Class<?> sei) and I'm facing thread safety problem when invoking methods on proxy instance in multiple threads. I'm not able to find anything about proxy thread safety in JAX-WS specification. What about me I think proxy should be thread safe from method invocation point of view. What do you think about it? Richard View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4110102#4110102 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4110102

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Contents of the SOAP request

by jpechane＠redhat.com

OK, I tried two approaches 1) use typecasting to StubExt and set security config. Then security works OK, but my handler is called before message is enriched with security elements 2) I used handlerChain.add(new org.jboss.ws.extensions.security.jaxws.WSSecurityHandlerClient()); In this case my handler was called after the security one. The WS was successfully invoked but when the service returned result, the client thrown an exception SOAP request exception [testng] org.jboss.ws.WSException: Cannot find child element: return Apparently the client did not processed WSS headers So I am looking for one of the two solutions 1) Force client to first process security set via StubExt and then the process handlers (preferred) 2) Or enable the second approach working. maybe I need to add another handler that will process the response separately? Thanks in advance J View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4109810#4109810 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4109810

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

Stack Metro Release Criteria

by Thomas Diesler

Heiko, could you please define the jbossws-2.1.0.GA release criteria for Metro These should be subtasks on http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBWS-1922 cheers -thomas -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thomas Diesler Web Service Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - WS-RM client examples

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

Hi Team/Community, there are WS-RM client examples in the form of tests in the stack/native/trunk SVN repository. There are covered four main usecases now: * One-Way Anonymous Client * One-Way Addressable Client * Request-Response Anonymous Client * Request-Response Addressable Client Classes ready for review are: * RMAbstractOneWayTest * RMAnonymousOneWayTestCase * RMAddressableOneWay TestCase * RMAbstractReqResTest * RMAnonymousReqResTestCase * RMAddressableReqResTestCase WS-RM public API is in org.jboss.ws.extensions.wsrm.api.*. This is the only API, that will be used from client code. Your opinion about this API is important for our team. Please post your comments about what you (dis)like on these examples. Tips for API improvements are welcomed as well:) Richard View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4109795#4109795 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4109795

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jbossws-dev December 2007