February 2007 - jbossws-dev - Jboss List Archives

by Thomas Diesler

ok, thanks Anil Saldhana wrote: > Hi Thomas, > I think what you are referring to are maybe 1 juddi service + 1 > servlet. You can place them in a subproject of ws and bring them as > binary dependencies. Very rarely do these change across releases. > > Regards, > Anil > > > Thomas Diesler wrote: >> Hi Anil, >> >> is it ok to extract jaxr from jbossas/varia in an independent >> project, so jbossas and jbossws can have a binary dependency? >> >> cheers >> -thomas >> > -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thomas Diesler Web Service Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Why is the UMDM using ConcurrentHashMap?

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Jas, please be forgiving with Heiko - he must have been on crack. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4015835#4015835 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4015835

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

dependency on juddi-service.sar

by Thomas Diesler

Hi Anil, is it ok to extract jaxr from jbossas/varia in an independent project, so jbossas and jbossws can have a binary dependency? cheers -thomas -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thomas Diesler Web Service Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Why is the UMDM using ConcurrentHashMap?

by jason.greene＠jboss.com

The ConcurrentHashMap change was not merged to 1.2.0, and I left it out when i merged the log changes it was bundled with. Anyway there is no way that ConcurrentHashMap could have reduced synchronization since it *adds* synchronization. Removing synchronization was one of the big reasons for the Java collection types in 1.2. Only the pre 1.2 collection types synchronized all methods (Hashtable and Vector). If you still don't believe me, read the javadoc http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/HashMap.html View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4015751#4015751 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4015751

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

jbossws-1.2.0 release date

by Thomas Diesler

Folks, there are still a number of open issues that hold back the 1.2.0 release. http://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hid... Please give a reliable indication of when you can be done. At the last conf call we agreed on Monday this week. cheers -thomas -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thomas Diesler Web Service Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: Property Replacement in Messages - (Case escalates at 23:00 CET today)

by Thomas Diesler

17 years, 11 months

2
2
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Why is the UMDM using ConcurrentHashMap?

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Lets revisit this for 1.2.1 http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBWS-1516 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4015720#4015720 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4015720

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Text nodes in SOAP messages

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

Correct, comments are not whitespace. In SOAP 1.2 they are considered separately: anonymous wrote : 5. SOAP Message Construct | [...] | Comment information items MAY appear as children and/or descendants of the [document element] element information item but not before or after that element information item View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4014763#4014763 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4014763

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Why is the UMDM using ConcurrentHashMap?

by jason.greene＠jboss.com

You are thinking of HashTable. HashMap does not use locks at all. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4014690#4014690 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4014690

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Why is the UMDM using ConcurrentHashMap?

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

AFAIK plain HashMap is holding a _map wide_ lock for any retrieval operation or iterator traversal. ConcurrentHashMap doesn't do it (well, at least more fine grained). I am not looking at write operations. Performance tests showed that concurrent requests to the same service (shared meta data) suffered from synchronisation issues. That's why i replaced the plain HashMap. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4014634#4014634 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4014634

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jbossws-dev February 2007