"heiko.braun(a)jboss.com" wrote :
| OK. So far you are right.
| The load balancer doesn't know about the addressing porperties.
| But JBossWS does. Currently we can dispatch beased on WS-Addressing properties. I
think this should be extended to fully support virtual addresses within a cluster
topology.
|
Ok, right. I have to read something more on ws-addressing
"heiko.braun(a)jboss.com" wrote :
| IMO this problem is not related to WS-Eventing in particular.
| It's a WS-Addressing problem that occurs in any cluster toplogy and should
addressed there.
|
100% agree
"heiko.braun(a)jboss.com" wrote :
| Therefore i'd favor a common solution that's build around WS-Addressing and
thus supports any WS-* extension which is composed with WSA.
|
Of course it's the best approach...I'm going to have a deeper look to WS specs.
Just one more question: it seems becoming something more widespread modification. Can I go
on, or do you prefer a committer working on that?
And if yes, is it better it will go in jbossws 2.0?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989727#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...