Re: web services problems with SOA-P
by Thomas Diesler
Sure, this is the thread
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=122212
cheers
-thomas
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 16:47 +0000, Mark Little wrote:
> Thomas, it appears that JBossWS is causing us problems within the SOA
> Platform. Either Mike or Trevor will be able to provide you with more
> details, but can you please get your team to give this priority over
> the next day or so?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Mark.
>
> ----
>
>
> Mark Little
> mlittle(a)redhat.com
>
>
> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
> Street, Windsor, Berkshire,
> SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
> Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David
> Owens (Ireland)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
Web Service Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
17 years, 2 months
Re: #jbosssoa
by Thomas Diesler
We already have communication channels setup that we monitor with high
priority. Generally, these are the dev forums and the respective jira
projects. Only if there is a jira issue, I can schedule work on it and
have SVN commits linked to the issue. There are also cross references
between jira and forum posts. All this will be lost with IRC.
In short, if you have an issue please discuss it on the forum first.
When its well understood, we create an jira issue for it and start
progress on it.
cheers
-thomas
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 10:19 -0400, Mike Brock wrote:
> This is very important. We need all of the project leads and active
> members from: Drools, ESB, Messaging, Web Services, and jBPM
> specifically to start making a habit out of hanging out in this channel.
>
> On 30-Oct-07, at 10:10 AM, trevor kirby wrote:
>
> > To try and cut down on communication delays while resolving SOA
> > platform issues can you please join the #jbosssoa IRC channel
> > Can you also please encourage your team members to do the same. The
> > connection details are :-
> > server: devserv.devel.redhat.com/6667
> > channel: #jbosssoa
> >
> > Trev
> >
> > --
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place,
> > 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
> > Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
> > Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David
> > Owens (Ireland)
> >
>
> Mike Brock
> Senior Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (JBoss Division)
> cbrock(a)redhat.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This message is intended only for the designated
> recipient(s). It may contain confidential or proprietary information
> or other confidentiality protections. If you are not a designated
> recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you
> receive this in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
> delete this message. Thank you.
>
>
>
>
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
Web Service Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
17 years, 2 months
Re: DII Implementation
by Thomas Diesler
Hi Darran,
this seems to be a bug. I cannot find this requirement in any of the
specs either. If this really needs to get fixed please create a jira
issue for it.
cheers
-thomas
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 16:49 +0100, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
> Would it be possible for one of you to take a look at this case please?
>
> https://na1.salesforce.com/50030000003j9iM
>
> The customer is making a DII call to a RPC endpoint and in the response
> the first child element of the soap body is 'retrievePackagesResponse'
> however we are assuming it is called 'result'.
>
> I have had a look at the 'org.jboss.ws.core.CommonSOAPBinding'
> implementation and I can see that if this was a Document endpoint it
> would have been able to fall back to checking by type but as it is RPC
> it is skipping this and throwing the following error: -
>
> java.rmi.RemoteException: Call invocation failed; nested exception is:
> org.jboss.ws.WSException: Cannot find child element: result
> at
> org.jboss.ws.core.jaxrpc.client.CallImpl.invokeInternal(CallImpl.java:536)
> at org.jboss.ws.core.jaxrpc.client.CallImpl.invoke(CallImpl.java:277)
> at com.hrlogix.view.test.WebService.main(WebService.java:54)
> Caused by: org.jboss.ws.WSException: Cannot find child element: result
> at
> org.jboss.ws.core.CommonSOAPBinding.getParameterFromMessage(CommonSOAPBinding.java:906)
> at
> org.jboss.ws.core.CommonSOAPBinding.unbindResponseMessage(CommonSOAPBinding.java:622)
> at org.jboss.ws.core.CommonClient.invoke(CommonClient.java:365)
>
>
> >From looking at the code I can not see any way that the name of the
> return parameter can be set. Is this something that should be possible?
> I am unaware of a requirement for the result to be contained within an
> element called 'result'.
>
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
Web Service Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
17 years, 2 months
[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Problems getting WS into ESB
by Kevin.Conner@jboss.com
"thomas.diesler(a)jboss.com" wrote : anonymous wrote :
| | I still don't know whether the SP2 release includes this fix or not, you owe me an answer on that one ;)
| |
|
| Yes it does.
|
Thank you :)
"thomas.diesler(a)jboss.com" wrote : #2 we use the AS4.2.1 binary relase
Yes, we use the binary.
"thomas.diesler(a)jboss.com" wrote : In both cases installing jbossws-2.0.1.SP2 is not trivial because the AS container integration has moved to Branch_4_2 after the AS4.2.1 release.
Which is the issue Trevor is finding. I am assuming that 'after the AS4.2.1 release' means 'AS4.2.2 and later', is this correct?
"thomas.diesler(a)jboss.com" wrote : Please show me exactly how you attempted to install jbossws-2.0.1.SP2 from that I can probably see how it should be done properly.
I believe Trevor is using your installation scripts to handle this aspect.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4099113#4099113
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4099113
17 years, 2 months