February 2008 - jbossws-dev - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Enforce container specific libraries (jbossxb, remoting) at c

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Folks, I noticed an invalid change to build-thirdparty.xml to the effect that remoting and jbossxb are downloaded dependent on the target container. I rolled back and added the following comment |  | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4133286#4133286 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4133286

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Run tests-compile without wsconsume

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Folks, did you know that you can run | [tdiesler@tddell trunk]$ ant -Dnoconsume=true tests-compile | Buildfile: build.xml | ... | wsconsume: | | tests-compile: | [javac] Compiling 2 source files to /home/tdiesler/svn/jbossws/stack/native/trunk/output/tests/classes | | BUILD SUCCESSFUL | Total time: 5 seconds | This reduces test compile time dramatically. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4133144#4133144 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4133144

16 years, 11 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Signatures and CRs

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

I like this fix View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4132920#4132920 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4132920

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Signatures and CRs

by alessio.soldano＠jboss.com

Here are my thoughs and what I did: generally speaking I think a message containing CRLF is valid. Parsers are able to deal with them and according to the specs CR must be converted to LF when parsing. When sending a message you should thus know that if there's a CR in the document's content, it should not be send as a literal otherwise it will be normalized to LF when the document is parsed; it should be encoded as & # x D ; instead (sorry for the padding spaces ;-) ). As a matter of fact, according to my tests, if you don't run into any transition to DOM_VALID representation of the soap content (need to comment out most of the message logging stuff to achieve this), you already get this (the & # x D ; ) using our stack when outputting messages containing \r in a string content. Thus IMHO the problem was in the DOMWriter's normalize method which didn't convert \r into & # x D ; . So I fixed it. This way, along with the changes done for JBWS-1974, the wsse implementation computes the signature over an element whose content is what the user specified and will not be altered during parsing on client side. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4132914#4132914 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4132914

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - ejb3/ws integration

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I know we have talked about needing a proper ejb3 spi for ws to use, and that this should be part of the integration project. I have this ejb3 forum thread to track its completion: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4132713#4132713 We need this in order to externalize the ejb3 core apis. Is there agreement on what is needed? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4132715#4132715 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4132715

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [Fwd: [jbossws-dev] User project generator]

by Alessio Soldano

Yes, if everybody agree on this, I could try and port it to that branch after a final check before the 2.0.4 release. Cheers Alessio Burr Sutter ha scritto: > Alessio, > > Can you make it work with JBossWS 2.0.1.SP2? As that is the > "official" version of JBossWS that is supported. > Burr > > > Alessio Soldano wrote: >> Hi David, >> you're right, the wiki page says "Since 2.0.4". That's because this >> has been developed recently, thus is currently available in src only. >> It will be release in the upcoming 2.0.4 version, which is scheduled >> for the end of March. >> Cheers >> Alessio >> >> David Ward ha scritto: >>> It is very much "future tools", and as cool as it looks, I don't >>> think it would be good to send to them unless that is very much >>> underlined. Reason? Alessio, correct me if I'm wrong, but the wiki >>> page says "Since 2.0.4". JBoss EAP ships with JBoss WS 2.0.1.SP2. >>> This customer is upset enough as it is with product version >>> mismatches; I don't want to confuse them further. I myself thought >>> I'd take Burr up on his invitation, and was going to give it a go >>> (with WS 2.0.2), only to find the ant targets didn't exist. It was >>> only then I noticed the wiki statement "Since 2.0.4." Anyway, then >>> I thought I'd download 2.0.4, just for fun - but the WS download >>> page only lists WS native through version 2.0.3.... Is this only >>> available in src at the moment? >>> >>> David >>> >>> >>> Kyle Gonzales wrote: >>>> Do you think this link is good to send to the customer, as long as we >>>> qualify it as a new tool that is not yet part of the stack? >>>> >>>> Perhaps we can use this as an example of one of the "future tools" >>>> that >>>> will be in RHDS. ;) >>>> >>>> On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 10:36 -0500, Burr Sutter wrote: >>>>> Thank you! >>>>> >>>>> I've copied David & Kyle because they specifically are getting >>>>> abused by users who feel our WS stack is too difficult to use, >>>>> specifically due to the lack of IDE support. It could be that >>>>> your tool is a step in the right direction. >>>>> >>>>> David, do you think you can perform a quick eval of this component? >>>>> >>>>> Funny enough I worked with James Williams on the original idea of >>>>> "seamgen" so naturally I like the idea. :-) >>>>> >>>>> Alessio Soldano wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> I'm still using RHDS Beta1, thus I'd say it works with JBDS >>>>>> (considering it uses basic eclipse features), however I'll give >>>>>> it a try soon with JBDS and other Eclipse versions. >>>>>> Honestly I don't know if/how many customer are actually asking >>>>>> for this, but considering my previous user experience this might >>>>>> be really useful; anyway there's been a brainstorm on the dev >>>>>> forum some months ago about ws productivity in general and the >>>>>> idea of doing this generator is part of the efforts we agreed >>>>>> upon to make the ws use easier. >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> Alessio >>>>>> >>>>>> Burr Sutter ha scritto: >>>>>>> That is great. It has been hard to "get started". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you know if it works with JBDS and EAP 4.2/4.3? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We have customers asking for this sort of thing right now? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>>>>> Subject: [jbossws-dev] User project generator >>>>>>> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:11:45 +0100 >>>>>>> From: Alessio Soldano <asoldano(a)redhat.com> >>>>>>> To: jbossws-dev <jbossws-dev(a)lists.jboss.org> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Folks, >>>>>>> this morning I've written this page on the wiki: >>>>>>> http://jbws.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Setup_your_IDE >>>>>>> It's about the ws-enabled user project generator I committed a >>>>>>> couple of weeks ago (something like the SeamGen tool). >>>>>>> As you can read there, it's meant to provide an easy way to >>>>>>> start a web service user project, without spending a lot of time >>>>>>> dealing with libraries selection, writing an Ant build file and >>>>>>> performing basic Eclipse configuration. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Richard (or anybody else using Windows), could you please give >>>>>>> the above-mentioned stuff a try (since I tested it with Linux >>>>>>> only)? >>>>>>> Apart from the test, this is for native stack only right now. If >>>>>>> you like the idea, once the changes for jbossws 3 are done, I >>>>>>> could modify this stuff to make it available for all the stacks >>>>>>> binary releases. Please let me know what you think about this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>> Alessio >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> jbossws-dev mailing list >>>>>>> jbossws-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev >>>>>>> >> >

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Signatures and CRs

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

IMHO, we should generally decide whether a combination of CR+LF is valid for an incomming message. If it is valid (even for a normal incoming message) the stack should preserve it. It can possibly be invalid for an incoming message that uses WS-Security, in which case we should have a clear error message if possible. If it is invalid, our stack should not produce it. Generally, I believe we should be strict rather than lenient with respect to message integrity. Axis opted to be lenient and tried to tolerate all sorts of inconsistencies - AFAICS they ended up with an unmaintainable code base. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4132091#4132091 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4132091

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [Fwd: [jbossws-dev] User project generator]

by Alessio Soldano

Hi David, you're right, the wiki page says "Since 2.0.4". That's because this has been developed recently, thus is currently available in src only. It will be release in the upcoming 2.0.4 version, which is scheduled for the end of March. Cheers Alessio David Ward ha scritto: > It is very much "future tools", and as cool as it looks, I don't think > it would be good to send to them unless that is very much underlined. > Reason? Alessio, correct me if I'm wrong, but the wiki page says > "Since 2.0.4". JBoss EAP ships with JBoss WS 2.0.1.SP2. This > customer is upset enough as it is with product version mismatches; I > don't want to confuse them further. I myself thought I'd take Burr up > on his invitation, and was going to give it a go (with WS 2.0.2), only > to find the ant targets didn't exist. It was only then I noticed the > wiki statement "Since 2.0.4." Anyway, then I thought I'd download > 2.0.4, just for fun - but the WS download page only lists WS native > through version 2.0.3.... Is this only available in src at the moment? > > David > > > Kyle Gonzales wrote: >> Do you think this link is good to send to the customer, as long as we >> qualify it as a new tool that is not yet part of the stack? >> >> Perhaps we can use this as an example of one of the "future tools" that >> will be in RHDS. ;) >> >> On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 10:36 -0500, Burr Sutter wrote: >>> Thank you! >>> >>> I've copied David & Kyle because they specifically are getting >>> abused by users who feel our WS stack is too difficult to use, >>> specifically due to the lack of IDE support. It could be that your >>> tool is a step in the right direction. >>> >>> David, do you think you can perform a quick eval of this component? >>> >>> Funny enough I worked with James Williams on the original idea of >>> "seamgen" so naturally I like the idea. :-) >>> >>> Alessio Soldano wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> I'm still using RHDS Beta1, thus I'd say it works with JBDS >>>> (considering it uses basic eclipse features), however I'll give it >>>> a try soon with JBDS and other Eclipse versions. >>>> Honestly I don't know if/how many customer are actually asking for >>>> this, but considering my previous user experience this might be >>>> really useful; anyway there's been a brainstorm on the dev forum >>>> some months ago about ws productivity in general and the idea of >>>> doing this generator is part of the efforts we agreed upon to make >>>> the ws use easier. >>>> Cheers >>>> Alessio >>>> >>>> Burr Sutter ha scritto: >>>>> That is great. It has been hard to "get started". >>>>> >>>>> Do you know if it works with JBDS and EAP 4.2/4.3? >>>>> >>>>> We have customers asking for this sort of thing right now? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>>> Subject: [jbossws-dev] User project generator >>>>> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:11:45 +0100 >>>>> From: Alessio Soldano <asoldano(a)redhat.com> >>>>> To: jbossws-dev <jbossws-dev(a)lists.jboss.org> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Folks, >>>>> this morning I've written this page on the wiki: >>>>> http://jbws.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Setup_your_IDE >>>>> It's about the ws-enabled user project generator I committed a >>>>> couple of weeks ago (something like the SeamGen tool). >>>>> As you can read there, it's meant to provide an easy way to start >>>>> a web service user project, without spending a lot of time dealing >>>>> with libraries selection, writing an Ant build file and performing >>>>> basic Eclipse configuration. >>>>> >>>>> Richard (or anybody else using Windows), could you please give the >>>>> above-mentioned stuff a try (since I tested it with Linux only)? >>>>> Apart from the test, this is for native stack only right now. If >>>>> you like the idea, once the changes for jbossws 3 are done, I >>>>> could modify this stuff to make it available for all the stacks >>>>> binary releases. Please let me know what you think about this. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Alessio >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> jbossws-dev mailing list >>>>> jbossws-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev >>>>>

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Signatures and CRs

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

"alessio.soldano(a)jboss.com" wrote : "richard.opalka(a)jboss.com" wrote : "alessio.soldano(a)jboss.com" wrote : | | | Fortunately this issue only happens when the message is not encrypted. Signature+encryption prevents this since the xml parser works with the encrypted element data. | | If we're not able to fix the problem we could suggest our users to use base64 encoding of such strings before putting them to the message payload (the workaround) | | Yep, this is a workaround too, you're right. I'd like wonder whether other WS-Security implementations don't have the same problem ;) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4131942#4131942 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4131942

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Signatures and CRs

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

"alessio.soldano(a)jboss.com" wrote : | Sorry, may be I'm missing something, why this should have nothing to do with our issue? The spec says: "To simplify the tasks of applications, the XML processor MUST behave as if it normalized all line breaks in external parsed entities (including the document entity) on input, before parsing, by translating both the two-character sequence #xD #xA and any #xD that is not followed by #xA to a single #xA character." We have a #xD not followed by #xA that is converted to #xA... I was wrong, you are true View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4131941#4131941 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4131941

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jbossws-dev February 2008