"palin" wrote : It can be obtained with less pain if the whole rm subsystem it designed keeping it in mind. I fully agree with you! We have to keep it in mind. "palin" wrote : | Are cookies really needed for rm? In any case the user loadbalancer choice is not our business ;-) If you have statefull services deployed to the cluster then cookies aware cluster nodes is a must. As I know almost all hardware/software loadbalancers are cookies aware. "palin" wrote : | I'll think about the handler issue you wrote in the meantime. | I'm looking forward for your ideas ;-) Richard View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4086701#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...