"thomas.diesler(a)jboss.com" wrote : | I propose to get the initial implementation going first. Then we investigate the pros/cons of a standalone decoupled RM implementation. IMO RM Sender/Receiver must be decoupled from client proxy/endpoint. However I was following just three goals when writing this first RM prototype: * finish it till the end of this year * provide the functional test suite covering all scenarios from Microsoft interop * cover the WS-Security combinations too "thomas.diesler(a)jboss.com" wrote : After all, if a RM implementation cannot provide reliable messaging (because of its coupling) - it is pointless to use it from the customer point of view ;-) Again, you're absolutely right and I'm happy you're diving into RM dilemma too because our communication about it becomes meaningful ;-) I'm figuring out this pointless RM implementation, but it's not final solution. It's just first prototype that works. But there's still a lot of work to make it better and more meaningful not only from customer point of view. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4114983#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...