[mod_cluster-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (MODCLUSTER-221) Only 100 webapps are detected : Maxcontext doesn't seem to be read

Only 100 webapps are detected : Maxcontext doesn't seem to be read ------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: MODCLUSTER-221 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/MODCLUSTER-221 Project: mod_cluster Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 1.1.1.Final Environment: RHEL5, JBOSS EAP 5.1.0.GA, JDK Sun 1.6.0_22, [root@LB ~/provisionning-from-scratch]$ httpd -V Server version: Apache/2.2.3 Server built: Mar 4 2010 09:57:54 Server's Module Magic Number: 20051115:3 Server loaded: APR 1.2.7, APR-Util 1.2.7 Compiled using: APR 1.2.7, APR-Util 1.2.7 Architecture: 64-bit Server MPM: Prefork threaded: no forked: yes (variable process count) Server compiled with.... -D APACHE_MPM_DIR="server/mpm/prefork" -D APR_HAS_SENDFILE -D APR_HAS_MMAP -D APR_HAVE_IPV6 (IPv4-mapped addresses enabled) -D APR_USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE -D APR_USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE -D SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT -D APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD -D AP_HAVE_RELIABLE_PIPED_LOGS -D DYNAMIC_MODULE_LIMIT=128 -D HTTPD_ROOT="/etc/httpd" -D SUEXEC_BIN="/usr/sbin/suexec" -D DEFAULT_PIDLOG="run/httpd.pid" -D DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD="logs/apache_runtime_status" -D DEFAULT_LOCKFILE="logs/accept.lock" -D DEFAULT_ERRORLOG="logs/error_log" -D AP_TYPES_CONFIG_FILE="conf/mime.types" -D SERVER_CONFIG_FILE="conf/httpd.conf" [17:25:43][root@LB ~/provisionning-from-scratch]$ httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.3 Server built: Mar 4 2010 09:57:54 Reporter: Baptiste MATHUS Assignee: Jean-Frederic Clere Labels: httpd, jboss-as Attachments: httpd.conf We're currently testing an architecture where we deploy 70 webapps in a 3-nodes cluster. After some times wondering why only some of the webapps were visible in the /mod_cluster-manager URL, we discovered that a Maxcontext parameter existed and was defaulting to 100. Then we set the Maxcontext parameter to 400, but it doesn't seem to change anything. Still only 100 webapp contexts are detected. I tried having a look at the C source code, but I don't see anything obvious. Maybe this parameter is just not read? Thanks a lot for your help.