[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-3958) NPE Executing Against Web Service Source using invokeHttp() procedure without stream parameter
by Johnathon Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Johnathon Lee updated TEIID-3958:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.7.3.6_2
> NPE Executing Against Web Service Source using invokeHttp() procedure without stream parameter
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-3958
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3958
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Misc. Connectors
> Affects Versions: 8.7.1, 8.7.1.6_2
> Environment: Migrated web services model from EDS 5.3.1 that does not include 'stream' parameter in the invokeHttp() procedure
> DV 6.1 - translator-ws-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar
> DV 6.2 - translator-ws-8.7.1.6_2-redhat-6.jar
> Reporter: Marc Shirley
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
> Fix For: 9.0, 8.12.5, 8.7.3.6_2
>
> Attachments: testStream.vdb
>
>
> Appears to still be an issue similar to TEIID 2537. Executing against the invokeHttp() procedure generated by JBDS 5 for Teiid Designer 7.7.3 without a stream parameter results in a slightly different stack trace, but appears to be the same issue.
> 2016-01-21 12:53:50,297 ERROR \[org.teiid.PROCESSOR\] (Worker22_QueryProcessorQueue117472) TEIID30019 Unexpected exception for request FzkQneotrSUs.5: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at org.teiid.translator.ws.BinaryWSProcedureExecution.getOutputParameterValues(BinaryWSProcedureExecution.java:174)
> at org.teiid.dqp.internal.datamgr.ProcedureBatchHandler.getParameterRow(ProcedureBatchHandler.java:86) [teiid-engine-8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1.jar:8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1]
> at org.teiid.dqp.internal.datamgr.ConnectorWorkItem.handleBatch(ConnectorWorkItem.java:435) [teiid-engine-8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1.jar:8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1]
> at org.teiid.dqp.internal.datamgr.ConnectorWorkItem.more(ConnectorWorkItem.java:207) [teiid-engine-8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1.jar:8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1]
> at org.teiid.dqp.internal.process.DataTierTupleSource.getResults(DataTierTupleSource.java:301) [teiid-engine-8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1.jar:8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1]
> at org.teiid.dqp.internal.process.DataTierTupleSource$1.call(DataTierTupleSource.java:110) [teiid-engine-8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1.jar:8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1]
> at org.teiid.dqp.internal.process.DataTierTupleSource$1.call(DataTierTupleSource.java:107) [teiid-engine-8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1.jar:8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1]
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) [rt.jar:1.8.0_65]
> at org.teiid.dqp.internal.process.FutureWork.run(FutureWork.java:58) [teiid-engine-8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1.jar:8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1]
> at org.teiid.dqp.internal.process.DQPWorkContext.runInContext(DQPWorkContext.java:274) [teiid-engine-8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1.jar:8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1]
> at org.teiid.dqp.internal.process.ThreadReuseExecutor$RunnableWrapper.run(ThreadReuseExecutor.java:119) [teiid-engine-8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1.jar:8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1]
> at org.teiid.dqp.internal.process.ThreadReuseExecutor$3.run(ThreadReuseExecutor.java:210) [teiid-engine-8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1.jar:8.7.2.6_2-redhat-1]
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) [rt.jar:1.8.0_65]
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) [rt.jar:1.8.0_65]
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) [rt.jar:1.8.0_65]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-3950) UDFs aren't found when using old function definitions model
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on TEIID-3950:
------------------------------------------------
jolee(a)redhat.com changed the Status of [bug 1304743|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304743] from NEW to MODIFIED
> UDFs aren't found when using old function definitions model
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-3950
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3950
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Server
> Affects Versions: 8.7.2.6_2
> Reporter: Debbie Steigner
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
> Fix For: 9.0, 8.12.5, 8.13.1, 8.7.3.6_2
>
>
> When migrating an old VDB that contains the old functiondefinitions model the server sees it as a Function model[1] but the functions are not found [2]when you try to use them.
> [1] [org.teiid.RUNTIME] (MSC service thread 1-7) Model udfTokenFunctions in VDB oldUDF skipped being loaded because of its type FUNCTION
> [2] [org.teiid.PROCESSOR] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue10) org.teiid.api.exception.query.QueryResolverException: TEIID30068 The function 'getToken('125421', '?', 2)' is an unknown form. Check that the function name and number of arguments is correct. Sending error to client 1trCiU5AkzFn.5
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-3950) UDFs aren't found when using old function definitions model
by Johnathon Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Johnathon Lee updated TEIID-3950:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.7.3.6_2
> UDFs aren't found when using old function definitions model
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-3950
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3950
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Server
> Affects Versions: 8.7.2.6_2
> Reporter: Debbie Steigner
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
> Fix For: 9.0, 8.12.5, 8.13.1, 8.7.3.6_2
>
>
> When migrating an old VDB that contains the old functiondefinitions model the server sees it as a Function model[1] but the functions are not found [2]when you try to use them.
> [1] [org.teiid.RUNTIME] (MSC service thread 1-7) Model udfTokenFunctions in VDB oldUDF skipped being loaded because of its type FUNCTION
> [2] [org.teiid.PROCESSOR] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue10) org.teiid.api.exception.query.QueryResolverException: TEIID30068 The function 'getToken('125421', '?', 2)' is an unknown form. Check that the function name and number of arguments is correct. Sending error to client 1trCiU5AkzFn.5
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-991) Request for support of Sybase IQ as a supported data source
by Johnathon Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Johnathon Lee closed TEIID-991.
-------------------------------
Resolution: Done
> Request for support of Sybase IQ as a supported data source
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-991
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-991
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Misc. Connectors
> Reporter: Marc Shirley
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
> Fix For: 8.7.3.6_2, 8.10
>
>
> Per client:
> We'd like the ability to have a built-in connector type for Sybase IQ,
> just the same as Sybase ASE We have been getting inquiries and we've
> had to decline one project because we didn't support Sybase IQ out of
> the box. We foresee that Sybase IQ will be getting some play within
> important Data Warehouses and Data Marts within the firm.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-991) Request for support of Sybase IQ as a supported data source
by Johnathon Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Johnathon Lee reopened TEIID-991:
---------------------------------
> Request for support of Sybase IQ as a supported data source
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-991
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-991
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Misc. Connectors
> Reporter: Marc Shirley
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
> Fix For: 8.10, 8.7.3.6_2
>
>
> Per client:
> We'd like the ability to have a built-in connector type for Sybase IQ,
> just the same as Sybase ASE We have been getting inquiries and we've
> had to decline one project because we didn't support Sybase IQ out of
> the box. We foresee that Sybase IQ will be getting some play within
> important Data Warehouses and Data Marts within the firm.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-991) Request for support of Sybase IQ as a supported data source
by Johnathon Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Johnathon Lee closed TEIID-991.
-------------------------------
Resolution: Done
> Request for support of Sybase IQ as a supported data source
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-991
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-991
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Misc. Connectors
> Reporter: Marc Shirley
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
> Fix For: 8.7.3.6_2, 8.10
>
>
> Per client:
> We'd like the ability to have a built-in connector type for Sybase IQ,
> just the same as Sybase ASE We have been getting inquiries and we've
> had to decline one project because we didn't support Sybase IQ out of
> the box. We foresee that Sybase IQ will be getting some play within
> important Data Warehouses and Data Marts within the firm.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-991) Request for support of Sybase IQ as a supported data source
by Johnathon Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Johnathon Lee updated TEIID-991:
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.7.3.6_2
> Request for support of Sybase IQ as a supported data source
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-991
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-991
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Misc. Connectors
> Reporter: Marc Shirley
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
> Fix For: 8.10, 8.7.3.6_2
>
>
> Per client:
> We'd like the ability to have a built-in connector type for Sybase IQ,
> just the same as Sybase ASE We have been getting inquiries and we've
> had to decline one project because we didn't support Sybase IQ out of
> the box. We foresee that Sybase IQ will be getting some play within
> important Data Warehouses and Data Marts within the firm.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
8 years, 10 months