[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-3462) Add support for semantic versioning of VDBs
by Steven Hawkins (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Steven Hawkins commented on TEIID-3462:
---------------------------------------
Perhaps what they are looking for here is something like WAB, war bundles. Such that the VDB itself is a bundle.
> Add support for semantic versioning of VDBs
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-3462
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3462
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Server
> Affects Versions: 8.7
> Reporter: Marc Shirley
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
>
> Semantic versioning [1] should be supported in the VDB versioning in order to be able to easier determine whether there are breaking changes from the client perspective and to more easily establish a link between client software versions and the VDBs they rely upon.
> [1] http://semver.org/
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
8 years, 12 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-3463) Add an importer for LDAP
by Steven Hawkins (JIRA)
Steven Hawkins created TEIID-3463:
-------------------------------------
Summary: Add an importer for LDAP
Key: TEIID-3463
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3463
Project: Teiid
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: LDAP Connector
Reporter: Steven Hawkins
Assignee: Steven Hawkins
Related to TEIIDDES-2499, Teiid should add import support for LDAP.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
8 years, 12 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-3429) Provide hooks to interrogate metadata prior to full import
by Steven Hawkins (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Steven Hawkins commented on TEIID-3429:
---------------------------------------
The code I have will add a special flag to the salesforce and the jdbc translators - something like exposeMetadata. Then on the getMetadata call instead of calling the normal MetadataProcessor logic, we'll expose procedures to assist with import. For JDBC this would be:
getTableTypes, getCatalogs, getSchemas, getTables, and getProcedures - with result sets that are similar to the analogous DatabaseMetadata methods. These would strictly be for examining the source metadata and would not use any import properties.
For salesforce we would just have getTables.
After interrogating those methods, Designer would set the appropriate importer values and deploy a vdb to perform the full import and produce the DDL.
Any thoughts?
> Provide hooks to interrogate metadata prior to full import
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-3429
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3429
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Server
> Reporter: Steven Hawkins
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
>
> To support the Desinger we should offer the ability to interrogate metadata prior to full import.
> Exploring metadata is effectively an entirely different mode of operation with respect to the current metadata processing logic on the Teiid side. Also partial metadata isn't something that would neatly be expressed through DDL - tables without columns, a list of schema names, etc.
> Ways around that would be to expose source procedures for metadata interrogation:
>
> getTableNames - which would probably give both the Teiid name and the name in source and consider the current translator metadata settings
> getProcedureNames
> And importer specific info such as for JDBC getTableTypes, getCatalogNames, getSchemaNames
>
> I'd want to keep it fairly high level though. Getting column or key information I'd expect would be done through the normal full import.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
8 years, 12 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-3448) User query should be terminated when TEIID30001
by Steven Hawkins (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Steven Hawkins resolved TEIID-3448.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
Marking as won't fix based upon internal review.
> User query should be terminated when TEIID30001
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-3448
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3448
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Query Engine
> Affects Versions: 8.4
> Environment: JDV6.0, 6.1
> Reporter: Hisanobu Okuda
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
> Attachments: buffertest.vdb, create_db.sql, jdv_client.zip, standalone.xml, testdata_a.csv.gz, testdata_b.csv.gz
>
>
> Even if I get the following error when I access a mat view for the first time just after starting JDV:-
> {code}
> 12:45:46,404 ERROR [org.teiid.BUFFER_MGR] (BufferManager Cleaner) TEIID30001 Max block number exceeded by 1 0. Increase the maxStorageObjectSize to support larger storage objects. Alternatively you could make the processor batch size smaller.
> {code}
> the result for the query returns sucessfully.
> However, the 2nd access to the mat view gives an error at client side:-
> {code}
> org.teiid.jdbc.TeiidSQLException: Batch not found in storage 0
> at org.teiid.jdbc.TeiidSQLException.create(TeiidSQLException.java:135)
> at org.teiid.jdbc.TeiidSQLException.create(TeiidSQLException.java:71)
> at org.teiid.jdbc.StatementImpl.postReceiveResults(StatementImpl.java:668)
> {code}
> And server side:-
> {code}
> 12:52:50,961 ERROR [org.teiid.PROCESSOR] (Worker3_QueryProcessorQueue6) TEIID30019 Unexpected exception for request LdGNTpFDRwjr.0: java.lang.AssertionError: Batch not found in storage 0
> at org.teiid.common.buffer.impl.BufferManagerImpl$BatchManagerImpl.getBatch(BufferManagerImpl.java:306) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.common.buffer.SPage.getValues(SPage.java:237) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.common.buffer.TupleBrowser.nextTuple(TupleBrowser.java:223) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.tempdata.TempTable$QueryTupleSource.nextTuple(TempTable.java:192) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.tempdata.TempTableDataManager$ProxyTupleSource.nextTuple(TempTableDataManager.java:110) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.processor.relational.AccessNode.nextBatchDirect(AccessNode.java:369) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.processor.relational.RelationalNode.nextBatch(RelationalNode.java:278) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.processor.relational.LimitNode.nextBatchDirect(LimitNode.java:102) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.processor.relational.RelationalNode.nextBatch(RelationalNode.java:278) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.processor.BatchCollector$BatchProducerTupleSource.nextTuple(BatchCollector.java:89) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.processor.relational.GroupingNode.groupPhase(GroupingNode.java:405) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.processor.relational.GroupingNode.nextBatchDirect(GroupingNode.java:336) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.processor.relational.RelationalNode.nextBatch(RelationalNode.java:278) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.processor.relational.ProjectNode.nextBatchDirect(ProjectNode.java:146) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.processor.relational.RelationalNode.nextBatch(RelationalNode.java:278) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.processor.relational.RelationalPlan.nextBatch(RelationalPlan.java:136) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.processor.QueryProcessor.nextBatchDirect(QueryProcessor.java:151) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.processor.QueryProcessor.nextBatch(QueryProcessor.java:114) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.processor.BatchCollector.collectTuples(BatchCollector.java:159) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.query.processor.BatchCollector.collectTuples(BatchCollector.java:141) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.dqp.internal.process.RequestWorkItem.processMore(RequestWorkItem.java:444) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.dqp.internal.process.RequestWorkItem.process(RequestWorkItem.java:326) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> at org.teiid.dqp.internal.process.AbstractWorkItem.run(AbstractWorkItem.java:51) [teiid-engine-8.7.1.redhat-8.jar:8.7.1.redhat-8]
> ...
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
8 years, 12 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-3462) Add support for semantic versioning of VDBs
by Steven Hawkins (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Steven Hawkins commented on TEIID-3462:
---------------------------------------
Our notion of versioning (more like source control revisions) isn't really the same as release/semantic versioning. There would also be a lot of code changes to support a non-integer version - but not much benefit without additional connection semantics. It seems like what they are looking for could either just either be a convention on the integer version - use 10101 for example to represent version 1.1.1. Or to just deploy vdbs that include the application version in their name vdb-2.2.2.
> Add support for semantic versioning of VDBs
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-3462
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3462
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Server
> Affects Versions: 8.7
> Reporter: Marc Shirley
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
>
> Semantic versioning [1] should be supported in the VDB versioning in order to be able to easier determine whether there are breaking changes from the client perspective and to more easily establish a link between client software versions and the VDBs they rely upon.
> [1] http://semver.org/
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
8 years, 12 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-3462) Add support for semantic versioning of VDBs
by Marc Shirley (JIRA)
Marc Shirley created TEIID-3462:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Add support for semantic versioning of VDBs
Key: TEIID-3462
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3462
Project: Teiid
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Server
Affects Versions: 8.7
Reporter: Marc Shirley
Assignee: Steven Hawkins
Semantic versioning [1] should be supported in the VDB versioning in order to be able to easier determine whether there are breaking changes from the client perspective and to more easily establish a link between client software versions and the VDBs they rely upon.
[1] http://semver.org/
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
8 years, 12 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-3461) Error executing statement with lookup function - Sybase 15 ASE
by Steven Hawkins (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Steven Hawkins resolved TEIID-3461.
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.11
Resolution: Done
See also JBPAPP-5124 This exception is dependent upon the sybase driver and the server version.
>From http://infocenter.sybase.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.sybase.infocenter....
The simple workaround is to set the connection parameter JCONNECT_VERSION to 6 or later. I verified that this works with this scenario.
The other workaround would be to reduce the number of values that can be sent, such as setting the max dependent predicates down to 1 - however that would negatively impact performance.
The JTDS does not have this issue.
I'll update the docs that the data source should be configured with the JCONNECT_VERSION property.
> Error executing statement with lookup function - Sybase 15 ASE
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-3461
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3461
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 8.7.1.6_2
> Reporter: Juraj Duráni
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
> Fix For: 8.11
>
> Attachments: server.log
>
>
> Query [1] ends with an exception [2] (root sybase exception [3]). Source specific command [4]. Server log - see attachment.
> [1] SELECT BQT1.SmallA.IntKey, BQT1.MediumB.IntKey FROM BQT1.SmallA FULL OUTER JOIN BQT1.MediumB ON BQT1.SmallA.IntKey = lookup('BQT1.MediumB', 'IntKey', 'StringKey', BQT1.MediumB.StringKey) WHERE BQT1.MediumB.IntKey < 100 ORDER BY BQT1.MediumB.IntKey
> [2] org.teiid.jdbc.TeiidSQLException: TEIID30504 Remote org.teiid.core.TeiidProcessingException: TEIID30504 Source: 7738 TEIID11008:TEIID11004 Error executing statement(s): [Prepared Values: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488, 489, 490, 491, 492, 493, 494, 495, 496, 497, 498, 499, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531, 532, 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539, 540, 541, 542, 543, 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549, 550, 551, 552, 553, 554, 555, 556, 557, 558, 559, 560, 561, 562, 563, 564, 565, 566, 567, 568, 569, 570, 571, 572, 573, 574, 575, 576, 577, 578, 579, 580, 581, 582, 583, 584, 585, 586, 587, 588, 589, 590, 591, 592, 593, 594, 595, 596, 597, 598, 599, 600, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, 622, 623, 624, 625, 626, 627, 628, 629, 630, 631, 632, 633, 634, 635, 636, 637, 638, 639, 640, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 650, 651, 652, 653, 654, 655, 656, 657, 658, 659, 660, 661, 662, 663, 664, 665, 666, 667, 668, 669, 670, 671, 672, 673, 674, 675, 676, 677, 678, 679, 680, 681, 682, 683, 684, 685, 686, 687, 688, 689, 690, 691, 692, 693, 694, 695, 696, 697, 698, 699, 700, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713, 714, 715, 716, 717, 718, 719, 720, 721, 722, 723, 724, 725, 726, 727, 728, 729, 730, 731, 732, 733, 734, 735, 736, 737, 738, 739, 740, 741, 742, 743, 744, 745, 746, 747, 748, 749, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, 757, 758, 759, 760, 761, 762, 763, 764, 765, 766, 767, 768, 769, 770, 771, 772, 773, 774, 775, 776, 777, 778, 779, 780, 781, 782, 783, 784, 785, 786, 787, 788, 789, 790, 791, 792, 793, 794, 795, 796, 797, 798, 799,
> 800, 801, 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809, 810, 811, 812, 813, 814, 815, 816, 817, 818, 819, 820, 821, 822, 823, 824, 825, 826, 827, 828, 829, 830, 831, 832, 833, 834, 835, 836, 837, 838, 839, 840, 841, 842, 843, 844, 845, 846, 847, 848, 849, 850, 851, 852, 853, 854, 855, 856, 857, 858, 859, 860, 861, 862, 863, 864, 865, 866, 867, 868, 869, 870, 871, 872, 873, 874, 875, 876, 877, 878, 879, 880, 881, 882, 883, 884, 885, 886, 887, 888, 889, 890, 891, 892, 893, 894, 895, 896, 897, 898, 899, 900, 901, 902, 903, 904, 905, 906, 907, 908, 909, 910, 911, 912, 913, 914, 915, 916, 917, 918, 919, 920, 921, 922, 923, 924, 925, 926, 927, 928, 929, 930, 931, 932, 933, 934, 935, 936, 937, 938, 939, 940, 941, 942, 943, 944, 945, 946, 947, 948, 949, 950, 951, 952, 953, 954, 955, 956, 957, 958, 959, 960, 961, 962, 963, 964, 965, 966, 967, 968, 969, 970, 971, 972, 973, 974, 975, 976, 977, 978, 979, 980, 981, 982, 983, 984, 985, 986, 987, 988, 989, 990, 991, 992, 993, 994, 995, 996, 997, 998, 999] SQL: SELECT g_0.IntKey AS c_0 FROM bqt2.dbo.SmallA g_0 WHERE g_0.IntKey IN (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) OR g_0.IntKey IN (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) OR g_0.IntKey IN (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) OR g_0.IntKey IN (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?,
> ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) ORDER BY c_0
> [3] java.sql.SQLException: Remote com.sybase.jdbc4.jdbc.SybSQLException: Message empty.
> [4] [org.teiid.CONNECTOR] (Worker7_QueryProcessorQueue650) Source-specific command: SELECT g_0.StringKey, g_0.IntKey FROM bqt2.dbo.MediumB g_0
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
8 years, 12 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-3204) Admin shell throws an IncompatibleClassChangeError
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on TEIID-3204:
------------------------------------------------
Van Halbert <vhalbert(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1161428|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161428] from NEW to MODIFIED
> Admin shell throws an IncompatibleClassChangeError
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-3204
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3204
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Tools
> Affects Versions: 8.7.1
> Environment: OS: fedora 20
> arch: x86_64
> java: oracle 1.7
> Reporter: Juraj Duráni
> Assignee: Van Halbert
> Fix For: 8.7.1.6_2
>
>
> Admin shell throws an IncompatibleClassChangeError when wrong path to groovy script is provided along with load command.
> Actual result:
> ===> [import static org.teiid.adminshell.AdminShell.*; import static org.teiid.adminshell.GroovySqlExtensions.*; import org.teiid.adminapi.*;]
> FATAL: java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: the number of constructors during runtime and compile time for java.lang.Exception do not match. Expected 4 but got 5
> java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: the number of constructors during runtime and compile time for java.lang.Exception do not match. Expected 4 but got 5
> at groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.selectConstructorAndTransformArguments(MetaClassImpl.java:1406)
> at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.ScriptBytecodeAdapter.selectConstructorAndTransformArguments(ScriptBytecodeAdapter.java:237)
> at org.codehaus.groovy.tools.shell.CommandException.<init>(Command.groovy:60)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
> at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:526)
> ....
> ....
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
8 years, 12 months