Wrong count(*) result when joining data from two models
-------------------------------------------------------
Key: TEIID-1458
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-1458
Project: Teiid
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Query Engine
Affects Versions: 7.3, 7.2
Environment: Teiid 7.3 deployed on Jboss AS 5.1.0 GA running on Ubuntu Server
10.04 LTS, MySQL 5.1.51 running on the same maching as JBoss, SQL Server 2000 Standard SP4
running on Windows Server 2003
Reporter: Claudio Venturini
Assignee: Steven Hawkins
count(\*) gets a wrong result when is performed in a query which joins two tables coming
from two different models.
The first (named "sqlsrv") is a source model for a table stored in SQL Server
2000. The second (named "mysql") is a source model for a table stored in MySQl
5.1.
The query performs an inner join on the column "product_id", which is shared by
the two tables. All records match correctly, so there should be no difference in using an
inner join instead of other join types.
The query is the following:
{noformat}
SELECT
invoice,
invoice_date,
code,
sum(quantity) AS s,
avg(price) AS av,
count(*) AS dim
FROM
sqlsrv.test2.dbo.sales SL
INNER JOIN mysql.test.product_code PC ON SL.product_id = PC.product_id
GROUP BY invoice_date, invoice, code
ORDER BY invoice_date ASC, invoice ASC, code ASC
{noformat}
The result of count(\*) is 1 for all records, while for some of them it should be 2, as
there are duplicate records in the sales table, which are grouped by the GROUP BY clause.
Note that the problem exists only with the inner join. Left, right and outer joins work
well, even if the set of records that they produce is the same as that produced by the
inner join.
I noticed the problem in Teiid 7.2. Tonight I upgraded to 7.3, but the problem is still
there.
If the data are all in the same DB, the query works as expected. It is not significant in
which of the two DB each table resides. I think it is neither a problem of the SQL Server
connector, nor of the MySQL connector.
The data are the following:
*product_code*:
||code||category||product_id||
|1|1|125|
|2|1|127|
|3|1|123|
|4|1|121|
|5|1|126|
|6|1|124|
|7|1|122|
*sales*:
||invoice||invoice_date||product_id||quantity||price||
|009831|2009-08-15 00:00:00|125|350|1.070261|
|009831|2009-08-15 00:00:00|124|960|1.070261|
|009843|2009-08-15 00:00:00|121|648|1.515264|
|009843|2009-08-15 00:00:00|126|145|2.763902|
|009843|2009-08-15 00:00:00|126|25|2.407148|
|009855|2009-08-15 00:00:00|122|768|1.122835|
|009855|2009-08-15 00:00:00|123|540|1.158511|
|009855|2009-08-15 00:00:00|125|480|1.070261|
|009857|2009-08-15 00:00:00|122|440|1.498365|
|009857|2009-08-15 00:00:00|126|115|2.585525|
|009866|2009-08-15 00:00:00|122|736|1.498365|
|009866|2009-08-15 00:00:00|123|558|1.391339|
|009866|2009-08-15 00:00:00|125|378|1.336887|
|009866|2009-08-15 00:00:00|127|510|1.605391|
|009866|2009-08-15 00:00:00|126|435|2.585525|
|009847|2009-08-15 00:00:00|126|55|2.763902|
|009847|2009-08-15 00:00:00|126|5|2.407148|
|009847|2009-08-15 00:00:00|121|240|1.872018|
The result of the above query is:
||invoice||invoice_date||code||s||av||dim||
|009831|2009-08-15 00:00:00|1|350.0|1.070261|1|
|009831|2009-08-15 00:00:00|6|960.0|1.070261|1|
|009843|2009-08-15 00:00:00|4|648.0|1.515264|1|
|009843|2009-08-15 00:00:00|5|170.0|2.585525|1|
|009847|2009-08-15 00:00:00|4|240.0|1.872018|1|
|009847|2009-08-15 00:00:00|5|60.0|2.585525|1|
|009855|2009-08-15 00:00:00|1|480.0|1.070261|1|
|009855|2009-08-15 00:00:00|3|540.0|1.158511|1|
|009855|2009-08-15 00:00:00|7|768.0|1.122835|1|
|009857|2009-08-15 00:00:00|5|115.0|2.585525|1|
|009857|2009-08-15 00:00:00|7|440.0|1.498365|1|
|009866|2009-08-15 00:00:00|1|378.0|1.336887|1|
|009866|2009-08-15 00:00:00|2|510.0|1.605391|1|
|009866|2009-08-15 00:00:00|3|558.0|1.391339|1|
|009866|2009-08-15 00:00:00|5|435.0|2.585525|1|
|009866|2009-08-15 00:00:00|7|736.0|1.498365|1|
As you can see, count(\*) (the "dim" column) always returns 1, even if it should
return 2 for the product with id 126 in invoices 009843 and 009847.
If needed, I can provide you the two source models, and a dump of the two DBs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira