[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/TEIID-570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug...
]
Van Halbert commented on TEIID-570:
-----------------------------------
There's a small issue regarding expectations with what's already there, before I
add these.
The current expectation of getConnectorBindings is that it returns the unique set of
bindings (according to my conversation with Paul). It's not thought to be the
bindings that are being monitored (which could return multiple instances of the same
binding when clustering).
My initial thought to solve this would be to have seperate .bsh scripts for configuration
and for monitoring. This way the person who writes the script would know explicitly
which context they were asking for the bindings.
***************
Field, please comment on your expectations of using this and any recommendations on how
you would like to resolve this.
Please indicate if your expectation of the current getConnectorBindings is suppose to be
for monitoring or configuration (because they are not guaranteed to be the same)
***************
Need new methods to expose Services for Configuring and Monitoring
------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: TEIID-570
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/TEIID-570
Project: Teiid
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: AdminApi, Documentation, Server
Affects Versions: 6.1.0
Reporter: Van Halbert
Assignee: Van Halbert
Need new methods to expose Services for Configuring and Monitoring.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira