]
Christoph John commented on TEIID-5589:
---------------------------------------
Is it not the DDL in the first of my two comments?
NavigationProperty not working with Teiid odata, results in
TEIID16053
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: TEIID-5589
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5589
Project: Teiid
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 11.2.1
Reporter: Christoph John
Assignee: Steven Hawkins
Priority: Major
Attachments: AccountRecord.xml, metadata.xml
Teiid throws an error in case it tries to follow an odata Navigation property. I tried
this by using $expand and also by directly following a path. Two examples are shown below.
My $metaddata.xml file is attached, and also a single record from the Account table in
which the relevant comparison seems to happen. the uuidUser property you can find here.
I do not understand the error message. What is not clear to me is the assignment which is
mentioned there g1.uuidUser = g0.fkProfile
Just for your awareness, uuidUser and fkProfile are different columns of different types
that should not be compared in anyway. Maybe this is a hint what is going wrong. I would
the relevant NavigationProperty expect to be
<NavigationProperty Name="fkProfileInProfile"
Type="my_nutri_diary.Account" Nullable="false">
<ReferentialConstraint Property="fkProfile"
ReferencedProperty="idProfile"/>
Here are two example queries which fail with the same error
http://localhost:8080/odata4/vdb/my_nutri_diary/Profile(38)?$expand=fkPro...
http://localhost:8080/odata4/vdb/my_nutri_diary/Profile(38)/fkProfileInPr...
<error
xmlns="http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/ns/metadata">
<code>TEIID31172</code>
<message>
TEIID31172 Could not resolve expressions being compared to a common type excluding
character conversions: g1.uuidUser = g0.fkProfile
</message>
</error>
----------------------
There might also exist a bug in Teiid Designer, when changing the private key and
reimporting the database, the source in Teiid Designer looks as expected. However, a sync
of the vdb seems not to work properly. For the workaround described in this ticket, I had
to create a new vdb in order to get things to work correctely.