[
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TEIIDSB-170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug...
]
Ramesh Reddy commented on TEIIDSB-170:
--------------------------------------
In other posts I believe you've advocated for not worrying about
the efficiency of the operator,
yes, in other posts I talked about getting the functionality but this what you asking is
at a different level to bring whole different model where we are leasing out other
programs to define functionality. by no means spinning up a java process is quick and may
require more resources allocations etc.
Can you elaborate what that means? You're trying to based upon the
ddl assign cache names that will be associated to views - which could be a combination
>of vdb, schema, view name, deployment number - how does a prefix come into play?
The cache names generated already have prefix of vdb, schema, view-name and deployment
number. I am saying instead of looking up each individual cache, we can just look up by
vdb and deployment number as prefix to collect all the names that match for destruction or
metrics purposes. Right now Infinispan does not have this feature but will have it in
next revision. Even if had the full name we can not destroy a individual cache in this
version anyway, so no functionality is lost.
Automate materialization to JDG
-------------------------------
Key: TEIIDSB-170
URL:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TEIIDSB-170
Project: Teiid Spring Boot
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: OpenShift
Reporter: Steven Hawkins
Assignee: Ramesh Reddy
Priority: Major
Fix For: 1.5.0
Original Estimate: 1 week
Time Spent: 1 week, 3 days, 2 hours
Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
Create an internal materialization replacement needs that is turnkey materialization to
JDG (little to no user setup required)
- the operator may create the infinispan cluster if needed
- the status table and internal representation of the materialization target would be
setup automatically
For the user this would be as simple marking a view as materialized and then it would be
populated in jdg upon deployment. They would not have any concerns with cache naming,
status tables, etc.
For simplicity the initial version would make a similar assumption to the current
internal logic - it is for only a specific vdb. If the vdb cr is modified, then it's
expected that the cache would be recreated.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)