Recall that only in the internal materialization case did we not require the setting of a materialization target name.

In short yes. There should certainly be examples of spinning up a java process from go.

I don't fully understand what you are advocating here.

Automate materialization to JDG ------------------------------- Key: TEIIDSB-170 URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TEIIDSB-170 Project: Teiid Spring Boot Issue Type: Enhancement Components: OpenShift Reporter: Steven Hawkins Assignee: Ramesh Reddy Priority: Major Fix For: 1.5.0 Original Estimate: 1 week Time Spent: 1 week, 3 days, 2 hours Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes Create an internal materialization replacement needs that is turnkey materialization to JDG (little to no user setup required) - the operator may create the infinispan cluster if needed - the status table and internal representation of the materialization target would be setup automatically For the user this would be as simple marking a view as materialized and then it would be populated in jdg upon deployment. They would not have any concerns with cache naming, status tables, etc. For simplicity the initial version would make a similar assumption to the current internal logic - it is for only a specific vdb. If the vdb cr is modified, then it's expected that the cache would be recreated.