[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/TEIID-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Steven Hawkins resolved TEIID-236. ---------------------------------- Resolution: Deferred I'm inclined to not add the procedural access pattern as a separate concern. Teiid already appropriately checks for valid subset of procedural criteria in RulePlanProcedures. Also from a designer perspective determining when an access pattern is a procedural access pattern would simply involve checking the covered group to see if it resolves to a procedure. There is a case to be made that our normal concept of an access pattern should be the same thing as a "procedural" access pattern. That would predictably restrict the rows returned, work with procedural relational logic, and be valid for use with source indexes. However that would be a breaking change and has not yet been a requested feature. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira