On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 15:05 -0500, Ramesh Reddy wrote:
To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which
calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are
building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular
VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer!
I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are
"dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good name for
so that we all can refer it by the same name?
SVDB (Source VDB)
PVDB (Physical VDB)
Larry O'Leary <loleary(a)redhat.com>
Red Hat, Inc.