Re: [teiid-users] What should we call this artifact?

To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer! I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are "dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good name for this, so that we all can refer it by the same name?