[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-407) Specifiy @Named @Alternatives
by Thomas Andraschko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ]
Thomas Andraschko updated CDI-407:
----------------------------------
Environment: (was: It's actually a must-have for product development and a common case.
We would like to have multiple implementations in our core and just activate them via alternative.
I talked with struberg and its currently not defined in the specs.
e.g.
@Named public class A
@Named @Alternative public class B extends A
What should acutally happen if B is activated via beans.xml?
IMO B should be available in EL via "a" and "b".)
Description:
It's actually a must-have for product development and a common case.
We would like to have multiple implementations in our core and just activate them via alternative.
I talked with struberg and its currently not defined in the specs.
e.g.
@Named public class A
@Named @Alternative public class B extends A
What should acutally happen if B is activated via beans.xml?
IMO B should be available in EL via "a" and "b".
> Specifiy @Named @Alternatives
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: CDI-407
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-407
> Project: CDI Specification Issues
> Issue Type: Clarification
> Components: Beans, Inheritance and Specialization
> Reporter: Thomas Andraschko
>
> It's actually a must-have for product development and a common case.
> We would like to have multiple implementations in our core and just activate them via alternative.
> I talked with struberg and its currently not defined in the specs.
> e.g.
> @Named public class A
> @Named @Alternative public class B extends A
> What should acutally happen if B is activated via beans.xml?
> IMO B should be available in EL via "a" and "b".
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira